2011 trek madone 5.2 blue book

• Rider Notes

2011 Trek Madone 5.2

A carbon frame aero bike with high-end components and rim brakes.

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

4'11" – 5'3"

5'1" – 5'5"

5'3" – 5'7"

5'5" – 5'9"

5'7" – 6'0"

5'10" – 6'2"

6'0" – 6'4"

6'2" – 6'5"

🐐 Estimated

Do you have this bike? Help other riders make a decision about which size will work for them by sharing your own size and fit notes. Report your fit

I've made it here to Liege to chase a little bike race around France, but before I begin Trek was kind enough to invite me to their new Madone launch. And I'm glad they did. Besides having a lot of fun, I've had the opportunity to meet many of the people behind Trek and the innovative products they produce. Back in

Read Review

Jun 2012 · Caley Fretz

We give our first impressions of the all-new Trek Madone and an expanded Domane line

Mar 2010 · Lennard Zinn

Two-time world pursuit champion Taylor Phinney is Trek-Livestrong’s marquee rider.

Jan 2010 · James Huang

A racier and brawnier feel for the new Madone

Jan 2009 · Mat Brett

Lightweight, stiff and comfortable with superb ride quality

Jul 2008 · R BA

The Madone totally belies its racing heritage and design intent-it never felt like a race bike. More than anything, it shone as an all-around, long-day-in-the-saddle bike.

Last updated June 29 Not listed for 2,477 days

Expert road bike reviews and the latest road bike news, features and advice. Find rides & events, training articles and participate in our forums

Trek madone 5.2 – review.

The Trek Madone 5.2 was overhauled for 2013 and combines low weight and aerodynamics with the ride quality and dependable handling of the previous iteration of the US firm’s race bike.

The Madone 5.2 is perhaps the last model year 2013 machine to pass through RoadCyclingUK. As the calendar flicks over to MY2014, the Madone 5.2 will get Shimano’s new 11-speed Ultegra groupset, rather than the 10-speed version on our test bike, and a new lick of paint, but otherwise the spec and, most importantly, the frame remains the same.

The chassis

And what of the frame? Bikes in Trek’s high-end Madone range – that’s 5-Series, 6-Series and 7-Series machines – received a radical frame update in June 2012, when we first spotted it being ridden by the Radioshack-Leopard-Trek team at the Criterium du Dauphine.

The Madone 5.2 is based around a frame which utilities Kammtail Virtual Foil tube profiles and integrated brakes to help boost its aerodynamic prowess.

We ran through both features in our first look but, in short, the KVF tubes follow an airfoil shape but with the tail chopped off in a design which Trek say saves weight and improves stiffness while also complying with UCI rules. The KVF shape is most noticeable on the downtube but has also been applied to the fork, headtube, seattube and seatstays.

As for the integrated brakes, the Madone 5.2’s rear stopper has been moved to the chainstays – a design first applied to time trial machines but now regularly used on aero road bikes – and the front brake is cut into the fork crown. By removing the rear brake from its traditional position, Trek say they have been able to further tune the seatstays for weight, comfort and aerodynamics. The Madone 5.2 is certainly a smooth ride – but we’ll talk about that more soon.

Trek say the KVF tube profiles and integrated brakes result in 25 “free” watts when riding at 40km/h compared to the previous Madone. That’s a bold claim, and, like any aero machine we test, one we’re not able to confirm without heading into the wind tunnel.

The frame and fork are made from 500-Series OCLV carbon fibre. Bikes in the 6 and 7-Series range (which, incidentally, were tweaked in July to shed a little more weight) are made from higher grade (lighter, stiffer) 600-Series OCLV and 700-Series OCLV respectively, while 4-Series bikes (which share the KVF tube profiles – but not the integrated brakes – for MY2014) are made from 400-Series OCLV, and so on.

Finally, as far as the chassis is concerned, a Bontrager DuoTrap wireless speed and cadence sensor is incorporated into the non-driveside chainstay, and the presence of an integrated chain catcher is another impressive detail.

How have those changes affected the ride of the Madone 5.2?

Comfort can often be sacrificed by manufacturers in the hunt for aero gains (the Wilier Cento1AIR recently reviewed offers a harsher ride than the Cento1SR ) but the Madone 5.2 remains an impressively supple ride, particularly through the back-end. The Madone isn’t designed as a ‘comfort’ bike – the Domane occupies that position in Trek’s range – but it does an excellent job of taking the sting out of rough roads while remaining connected with the tarmac and keeping the rider in tune with what’s happening beneath them.

The Madone’s neutral handling has almost become its calling card and the 5.2 is no different: planted and completely in-tune with the rider. I prefer a little more va-va-voom but the Madone is an undeniably confidence-inspiring ride, whether that’s riding in the bunch, when descending or removing a jacket with your hands off the handlebar. Trek’s E2 headtube tapers from 1-1/8″ to 1-1/2″ and, combined with the straight-legged, KVF fork, the result is a reassuringly stable and planted front end.

The Madone 5.2 uses Trek’s proprietary BB90 bottom bracket – said to be the widest available for use on a road bike – and that results in a ride which is plenty stiff enough. The relatively low weight – 7.64kg for our test bike – ensures the Madone 5.2 is eager out of the blocks and climbs well, though it could easily shed significant weight by upgrading the Bontrager Race hoops that come as standard.

As for fit, the Madone 5.2 is based around Trek’s H2 geometry, which they say is “right for most riders” – most riders being those on the club run on a Sunday morning, riding sportives and perhaps dabbling in a bit of racing. As a result, the H2 fit is a little more relaxed than the racier H1 fit offered on 6 and 7-Series bikes. The key difference is the height of the headtube, which at 170mm is a little tall for me but by no means extreme.

The components

As we mentioned at the start, our 2013 Madone is dressed in 10-speed Shimano Ultegra, so with the 2014 Madone, now available through Trek dealers, equipped with the updated 11-version, we won’t say much other than it performed as we’ve come to expect from Shimano’s second-from-top group. The compact chainset and 11-28t cassette combine to provide a wide spread of gears.

A quick word on the new 11-speed setup, however. The revamped groupset borrows heavily from the top-end Dura-Ace setup, with a new four-arm chainset which is said to boost stiffness and sharper shifting thanks to a shorter leaver throw.

Trek’s house brand, Bontrager, provide the dual pivot, integrated brakes. Initial bite is good but we felt they lacked top-end power. We didn’t notice the rear brake accumulating dirt any more than it would have done if in its traditional position on the seatstays, but what did bug us, however, was that the screws which hold the brake pads aren’t easily accessible and require the removal of the whole shoe when swapping pads. The matte finish of the brakes also leaves them trailing other in terms of aesthetics.

The Race wheels are Bontrager’s entry-level hoops and come wrapped in Bontrager R3 tyres. While at 1,720g the wheels are far from the lightest, they’re stiff, roll well and are tubeless ready. They’ll make for good training wheels if you choose to upgrade the stock hoops.

Bontrager also supply the aluminium Race X Lite stem and Race Lite Aero handlebar, which has a KVF-inspired profile, and a compact, ergonomic shape which – for this reviewer at least – made it more comfortable to ride in the drops for long periods. A Bontrager Affinity 3 saddle completes the build.

Trek have combined low weight, stiffness, aerodynamics and comfort to good effect with the Madone 5.2, providing a helpful dose of each. As a result, and brake issues aside, the Madone 5.2 is a fine all-rounder.

Discuss in the forum

Price: £2,800 Sizes: 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62cm Website: Trek

UCI Track World Cup: Manchester - day two gallery

Joanna Rowsell, Martyn Irvine and Kristina Vogel wow another sell-out crowd in Manchester

Rowsell doubles up in Manchester

Olympic champion adds individual pursuit to team pursuit title

Featured in this post

Related Articles

Trott wins omnium gold on final day in Manchester

Olympic champion comes from behind on final day; Becky James wins keirin silver

Pro cyclist interview: Britain's newest track star Katie Archibald

Scottish teenager speaks exclusively to RCUK at the UCI Track World Cup in Manchester

Seven day round-up: Turbo trainer buyer's guide, inside the Team Sky bus and Juan Antonio Flecha interview

A recap of seven story-filled days on RCUK

Newsletter Terms & Conditions

Please enter your email so we can keep you updated with news, features and the latest offers. If you are not interested you can unsubscribe at any time. We will never sell your data and you'll only get messages from us and our partners whose products and services we think you'll enjoy.

Read our full Privacy Policy as well as Terms & Conditions .

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Manufacturer Forums

2011 Trek Madone 5.2

• Add to quote

Hello, New to this forum and to biking. Been a runner for many years and looking to get some cross training with a bike. Still very new to bikes and hoping this is an appropriate question. I came across a 'brand new' 2011 Madone, model is believe is 5.2 but need to confirm. From what I've read on this forum this is a very good bike, with maybe a wheel upgrade at some point to make it even better, and would be a good fit for non-competitive riding. Would appreciate any thoughts on if this is too much or not enough bike for casual rides of 20-50 miles or so, maybe longer if I really get into it. My primary question is what value the bike has considering its ~10 years old. Does age matter if it hasn't been ridden? Assuming technology on the bike has changed over this time even ifi there is no wear and tear. I believe MSRP was $3250 new. The bicycle blue book shows a used resale of ~$800, Although I see used ones being sold for much higher. Any insights as to what would be a good/fair price (for me and the shop) for this bike? If price/cost isn't to be discussed on this forum, please accept my apologies and disregard this question. Thanks for any info. Michael  

That bike would be good, more important is the size & fit. Will the bike take 28 tires? It really doesn't matter the $$$, if it don't fit, you know any bikers locally that could help U? If you don't, you'll need to post a lot more info if you expect any response of value. Is this the same bike you have problems with the steer tube?  

I had a 2009 Madone 5.2. I loved the way it rode and handled. I put 4000-6000 miles a year on it. My longest ride was a double century. I'd likely still have it only it was broken in an accident. I think the one you're looking at would be great for any riding. As duriel said, the fit is the most important aspect of how well it would work for you. I'm sorry, I can't really help with the value...I don't see age mattering as much as the condition. It is true that the newer equipment tends to work better (shifting, braking, etc.) but 2011 Ultegra will still give very good service. The biggest tires that would fit on my 2009 were 25mm. In my experience 25s are great for most any paved road surface.  

J.R. said: I had a 2009 Madone 5.2. I loved the way it rode and handled. I put 4000-6000 miles a year on it. My longest ride was a double century. I'd likely still have it only it was broken in an accident. I think the one you're looking at would be great for any riding. As duriel said, the fit is the most important aspect of how well it would work for you. I'm sorry, I can't really help with the value...I don't see age mattering as much as the condition. It is true that the newer equipment tends to work better (shifting, braking, etc.) but 2011 Ultegra will still give very good service. The biggest tires that would fit on my 2009 were 25mm. In my experience 25s are great for most any paved road surface. Click to expand...

MKJJ123 said: My primary question is what value the bike has considering its ~10 years old. Does age matter if it hasn't been ridden? Click to expand...

The bicycle blue book shows a used resale of ~$800, Although I see used ones being sold for much higher. Any insights as to what would be a good/fair price (for me and the shop) for this bike? If price/cost isn't to be discussed on this forum, please accept my apologies and disregard this question. Click to expand...

2011 Madone 5.2 - Bike Archive - Trek Bicycle

thanks for all the replies, very helpful. Unfortunately the $800 is what the blue book says this bike is worth used. The shop is asking well over that. They want to get back what they paid for it. When I started looking last summer, when bikes weren't available, I had a budget set of around $1500-$1700. This bike will exceed that, so I just need to decide if I want to spend the extra $$ to get much more bike than I had planned. Michael  

Appreciate all the replies. The shop is asking over $2k and not open to moving much. The bike may definitely be worth that but at this time it's not to me. Maybe in the spring when I want to ride I will feel differently, but that's well above what I had set as a price range for myself. Thanks again.  

• ?            
• 205.1K members

Top Contributors this Month

• off.road.cc
• Dealclincher
• Fantasy Cycling

Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

• Sportive and endurance bikes
• Gravel and adventure bikes
• Urban and hybrid bikes
• Touring bikes
• Cyclocross bikes
• Electric bikes
• Folding bikes
• Fixed & singlespeed bikes
• Children's bikes
• Time trial bikes
• Accessories - misc
• Computer mounts
• Bike bags & cases
• Bottle cages
• Child seats
• Lights - front
• Lights - rear
• Lights - sets
• Pumps & CO2 inflators
• Puncture kits
• Reflectives
• Smart watches
• Stands and racks
• Arm & leg warmers
• Base layers
• Gloves - full finger
• Gloves - mitts
• Jerseys - casual
• Jerseys - long sleeve
• Jerseys - short sleeve
• Shorts & 3/4s
• Tights & longs
• Bar tape & grips
• Bottom brackets
• Brake & gear cables
• Brake & STI levers
• Brake pads & spares
• Cassettes & freewheels
• Chainsets & chainrings
• Derailleurs - front
• Derailleurs - rear
• Gear levers & shifters
• Handlebars & extensions
• Inner tubes
• Quick releases & skewers
• Energy & recovery bars
• Energy & recovery drinks
• Energy & recovery gels
• Heart rate monitors
• Hydration products
• Hydration systems
• Indoor trainers
• Power measurement
• Skincare & embrocation
• Training - misc
• Cleaning products
• Lubrication
• Tools - multitools
• Tools - Portable
• Tools - workshop
• Books, Maps & DVDs
• Camping and outdoor equipment
• Gifts & misc

So what’s the difference between them? Hold your horses, we’re coming to that. Essentially, the 5.2 Pro has a more race-centric (did we just make that word up?) fit. Our 56cm model has a 140mm head tube compared to 170mm on the standard version for a lower ride position, and a slightly extended reach thanks to a 10mm longer stem. Plus, the 5.2 Pro has a traditional chainset while the straight 5.2 is fitted with a compact for a lower range of gears. However all the angles on both of the bikes are the same performance-oriented build, according to Trek both the bike's should interact with the road in the same way, what's different is the way the bike fits the rider: the Pro is essentially a performance bike with performance geometry and performance fit and the standard Madone is a performance bike with performance geometry, but with a less full-on fit.

So, the standard 5.2 has a more relaxed, sportive-friendly setup – what Trek call their Performance fit, the same as last year’s 5.2 – while the Pro is aimed more at racers.

What’s different?

The 5.2s haven’t altered massively from last year’s models although they do now come with replaceable gear hangers; it’s a whole lot easier to fit a new hanger than to have your frame repaired should it all go horribly wrong. And the hanger is longer than before so it’ll take a larger cassette – up to 28T if you like (a handy bail out gear for the hills if you went for the Pro and its standard 53-39).

Routing to both the front mech and the rear brake has been improved and the colour schemes have been altered, but apart from that Trek have left things pretty much alone this time around.

So what are they like to ride?

The Madones are quick… very quick. Climb aboard and stomp on the pedals and you’re rewarded with a remarkable turn of speed. Maybe it’s just us, but with chunky tubes throughout we’ve always thought that the Madones look pretty heavy. They’re not. Far from it. Our straight 5.2 (56cm model) hit the scales at 7.64kg (16.8lb) while the 5.2 Pro was 7.58kg (16.7lb). And that lack of weight is evident immediately as you accelerate fast up through the gears.

All manufacturers go on about how incredibly stiff their bottom brackets are but with the Madones it really is true… Rather than using a standard system where the bottom bracket bearings screw into but sit outside the frame’s BB shell, Trek house them inside a wider (90mm) shell and place them directly next to the bare carbon. This saves a little weight and also means that you get a colossal junction area where the down tube, seat tube and seat stays meet, so even when you turn on your best crank-bending power, that bottom bracket isn’t going anywhere.

The Q factor – the distance between the cranks – remains standard. And replacing the bearings when they wear out won’t be a problem: common standard-sized bearings to fit Shimano, SRAM, Bontrager, Campag and FSA are available.

With a 30mm shorter head tube and a 1cm longer stem, the 5.2 Pro puts you into a flatter and more aerodynamic ride position than the standard 5.2. You certainly feel that it’s a lower, head-led set-up. And with your body accounting for much more drag when you’re riding than the bike itself, that’s an important consideration if every second counts for you.

In other words, you will go a little faster on the Pro… as long as you’re comfortable in the more aggressive position. If you find it too low and start getting backache, the speed advantage quickly diminishes. It’s not like the Pro has an extreme ride position, though. Most people will get on with it fine. It’s more a question of ride character: do you want racy or slightly more relaxed? You pays your money and you takes your choice on that one.

Whichever model you go for, the 5.2s offer a stable, planted ride and a generous helping of ‘give’ in the frame keeps poor road surfaces from leaving you battered and bruised. Trek reckon this has a lot to do with their seat mast design – a carbon sleeve that clamps to the outside of the extended seat tube. Unlike some other systems, it doesn’t require cutting to length – which saves you some work and is handy if you ever want to sell the bike on. You choose from two different seat mast lengths and three different offsets in order to get the right fit.

The seat mast design requires only 30mm of overlap with the frame and it doesn’t need to be overbuilt and so, as well as saving weight, it can flex more than in a traditional system. It also means that, if you haven’t got one already, you should invest in a torque wrench because you really want to get the clamping bolts tightened just right to prevent any damage.

This all results in smooth ride quality meaning that not only do you continue feeling good at the end of long rides, you can carry on getting the power in when your ride-mates are wilting. And that’s always good news.

Hit the hills and the lack of weight helps the Madones stay ahead of the pack. Bontrager’s Race Lite wheels are reasonably – though not incredibly – stiff and they’re lightweight (1,015g f, 1,417g r, complete with skewers and tyres fitted). The18 flat bladed spokes up front and 20 at the rear held the rims straight throughout testing too – no drama there.

The slightly lower front end of the 5.2 Pro means you can get right over the top to wrestle it about that little bit easier on the killer gradients, but you might prefer the gearing of the straight 5.2 when things get really steep. Although both come with Shimano Ultegra SL cranks, the 5.2’s is a compact with 50/34T chainrings up front and a 12-25T cassette (it’s also available as a 52/39/30 triple); the Pro model comes with a traditional 53/39T setup matched to an 11-25T cassette. So, if you struggle on the climbs or you just want the confidence of low gears for winching up the steep stuff late in the day, the straight 5.2 could be the one for you.

Those Ultegra SL gears, second in Shimano’s groupset hierarchy behind Dura-Ace, worked flawlessly throughout testing. Lightweight and simple to use whether you’re on the hoods or the drops, they’re hard to fault, and the ice grey looks add a little something too.

Both bikes are excellent descenders largely thanks to the Bontrager Race X Lite fork which holds things steady through tight twists and turns. Built with carbon legs and crown, it’s very light weight and the lower section of the aluminium steerer is 1 1/2in in diameter rather than the usual 1 1/8in for added strength and rigidity. Steering is super-accurate so you get the confidence to abandon caution and attack everything full-on. Even hard braking at the last second isn’t a problem – and the Ultegra SL callipers pack a lot of power.

Both Madones offer an excellent blend of speed and comfort with genuine performance innovations like the integrated bottom bracket system and the aero seat mast design setting the bikes apart from the crowd. Two-and-a-half grand is a lot to spend on an Ultegra SL-equipped rig but you are getting a pretty special frame and forks package here. Should you go for the straight 5.2 or the Pro version? We’d be on the Pro because we prefer both the more racy geometry and the bigger gearing, but if you are a compact fan, and there are a few of them around here, and want a more standard set-up the straight 5.2 is the sound choice.

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the road.cc Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website

Help us to fund our site

We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99. 

If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.

Help us to bring you the best cycling content

If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. We send him off around the world to get all the news from launches and shows too. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

This is one of the finest reviews I have seen yet on the Madone, or any bike for that matter. It mentions the technical details but doesn't feature them. Instead this review gives a more practical overview of the bike as it pertains to the rider. It's nice to know about the unique seat mast design and the internal BB system but what does that mean to the rider in terms of feel, fit, finesse, and efficiency? Instead of dazzling us with technical jargon, this review nails down what the rider needs to know to make a decision. Kuddos to the reviewer for a nicely written piece.

• Log in or register to post comments

This review is spot on - the madone is a comfortable, yet light and responsive bike.

three things though - a) the 12cm standard seastmast has a limited range, and if you need the 16cm seatmast to gain a correct fit - budget £120 for this.

b) I'm surprised you didn't mention the uncomfortable racelite saddle that comes with it - this was the first thing I changed. Even a £20 charge spoon will be better.

c) my madone had an annoying 'crack' from the BB area when applying force to the pedals - this seems to have disappeared after the LBS regreased the bearings, but others have had similar problems.

nevertheless, relatively small niggles in an otherwise excellent bike.

Latest Comments

I'm pretty sure he'd reject a knighthood, or anything else from an antiquated honors system in england, and we don't have one in Cymru. But he's...

Entirely a product of cars:...

Not edited ANYYHING.  Are you sure you know what you're talking about? I'm convinced not ...

car crashes into building deliberately...

Looks like they're doing a bit of repainting of it tonight: https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/local-news/optical-illusion-cycle-lane-caused-9219854

“I’m hoping the timings will be such that cyclists don’t have long to wait. I understand that the Essex designers have received training from...

Richmond Park was closed to cars for a few days during the 2012 Olympics. It was great and not dangerous at all.

Better make sure you're armed, unless you want to walk home.

Ignoring the other factors like price and their aeroness.  they look faaaaaaaakin horrendous 

use allen key to tighten bolt.

Related Reviews

Fara F/Road

Quick, nimble, fun, an impressive ride quality and excellent comfort – and I think it looks stunning

Factor O2 VAM

A master of climbing – but a bike that's also incredible fun and extremely capable everywhere else

Orro Venturi STC SRAM Force eTap Tailor Made 2024

Real world aerodynamics and well-designed geometry create an excellent bike that is fast and easy to ride

Pearson Forge 2024

Fast and reactive road bike in a regular-rider-focused geometry

• Subscribers
• EDITORS PICK // TOP TWO CYCLING LIGHTS FOR 2023
• TOP TWO CYCLING LIGHTS FOR 2023
• TECH TUESDAY: DEALINGS WITH SHIMANO DI2
• ALL ABOUT WIND TRAINERS AND INDOOR CYCLING
• WHAT YOUR PRESTA VALVE CAPS ARE ACTUALLY FOR

BIKE TEST: ALLIED ECHO

• ALL ABOUT AIR & HOW-TO FIGHT FLAT TIRES
• PINARELLO F SERIES – WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE ALL-NEW RACE BIKES
• CANNONDALE UNVEILS SLEEK 2023 ROAD LINE-UP
• THROWBACK THURSDAY, 2015: ALEX DOWSETT BREAKS THE HOUR RECORD

Trek Madone 5.2

There’s no doubting that in the years since Lance Armstrong was winning the hearts and minds of cyclists and non-cyclists alike, Trek’s majority stake in carbon bike sales has slowed. Due to the advance of the competition and Trek’s own slowness in reinventing the Madone platform, many aspiring carbon bike owners began to look beyond the offerings from Wisconsin. So, Trek started all over. To get the job done, in the fall of 2006 Trek designers and engineers were literally put in a special room at Trek for three months to brainstorm the new design. Other than retaining the tried and true OCLV build process and the Madone name, they started over with a blank sheet of paper and redesigned the bike from the ground up. We first looked at the new Madone back in the October issue when we had a brief ride at the bike’s official rollout. Sure, the bike is all-new, but is it any better?  

THE FRAME One quick look at the new Madone 5.2 is all it takes to realize that the new Trek is in fact nothing like its similarly named predecessor. Every tube, every aspect of design has been altered, with probably the most telling being the asymmetrical chainstays. Besides the impressive array of individually sized and shaped tubes, a key frame element would have to be Trek’s version of the integrated seat mast. Trek came up with their own two-piece design that is basically an external seatpost, which allows 100 millimeters of adjustability. Trek took the extra step of making long and short seat mast tops available for personalized sizing. Also new for the 2008 Madone is the internal cable routing used for the rear brake cable. Early versions of the bike had the cable exiting the rear of the top tube on its left side, but rider complaint about knee contact prompted a change in cable exit from the top of the tube. Carbon molds don’t come cheap, so a tip of the hat to Trek for maintaining enough molds to build seven different size frames (50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60 and 62 centimeters).

THE PARTS Our Madone 5.2 features a collection of house brand Bontrager components including the Bontrager VR (variable radius) handlebars, which are a cross between an anatomic and a classic bend bar (that Lance preferred), Race Lite wheels, and the newly designed Race Lite saddle. The new saddle took us two or three rides and then we started to really like it, due to the ability to sit further back in the saddle while climbing or descending. We have yet to embrace the ‘saw the frame to fit’ technique that integrated seatmasts require. As much as we applaud Trek’s effort to maximize the benefits of the integrated seat mast, due to the clamp design and difficulty in getting consistent seat height, we’d have to say that they got it half right. The drivetrain on our 5.2 was the over-achieving Ultegra SL (53/39, 12-25) and it performed well in all situations, but we did notice the braking strength on fast and technical descents was noticeably less powerful than its more expensive brother, Dura-Ace.

THE RIDE The 5.2 was stable and comfortable on all types of surfaces. It handled well on bumpy and uneven surfaces and exhibited a noticeable glide on smoother roads. On climbs it was predictable and consistent, and on descents it was faster than we would have expected. For the higher-end group, the bike is not super-light at 16.2 pounds (Trek falls on the conservative side of the carbon weight issue), but the design, ride and experience made the weight not noticeable.   THE VERDICT The Madone totally belies its racing heritage and design intent-it never felt like a race bike. More than anything, it shone as an all-around, long-day-in-the-saddle bike. As impressive as the Madone 5.2 is, it’s worth noting also that Trek made it possible while retaining the higher built-in costs of American manufacturing. The Madone 5.2 is a lot of bike and ride for the money. Test rider after test rider commented that during group rides the bike stood out as a higher-end Madone and performed really well for the price. Yeah, the old Madone served Lance well, but he’s probably bummed that he never got to race this bike.

Price: $3629 Weight: 16.2 pounds Contact: www.trekbikes.com

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Sastre & Team CSC Win 95th Tour De France Better Late Than Never For Steegmans On Champs-lys‚es

First Edition News 29 July, 2008

FACTOR OSTRO GRAVEL VS FELT BREED CARBON – GRAVEL BIKE SHOOTOUT

THROWBACK THURSDAY, 2018: FROM THE PRO PELOTON TO SHIMANO TEST RIDER

THROWBACK THURSDAY, 2014: ROCKIN’ THE ROCK COBBLER GRAVEL RACE

Comments are closed.

We and our {{count}} partners use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your experience on our website. We may store and/or access information on a device and process personal data, such as your IP address and browsing data, for personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development. Additionally, we may utilize precise geolocation data and identification through device scanning.

Please note that your consent will be valid across all our subdomains. You can change or withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the “Consent Preferences” button at the bottom of your screen. We respect your choices and are committed to providing you with a transparent and secure browsing experience.

Privacy Overview

• Most purposes explained in this notice rely on the storage or accessing of information from your device when you use an app or visit a website. For example, a vendor or publisher might need to store a cookie on your device during your first visit on a website, to be able to recognise your device during your next visits (by accessing this cookie each time).
• A car manufacturer wants to promote its electric vehicles to environmentally conscious users living in the city after office hours. The advertising is presented on a page with related content (such as an article on climate change actions) after 6:30 p.m. to users whose non-precise location suggests that they are in an urban zone.
• A large producer of watercolour paints wants to carry out an online advertising campaign for its latest watercolour range, diversifying its audience to reach as many amateur and professional artists as possible and avoiding showing the ad next to mismatched content (for instance, articles about how to paint your house). The number of times that the ad has been presented to you is detected and limited, to avoid presenting it too often.
• If you read several articles about the best bike accessories to buy, this information could be used to create a profile about your interest in bike accessories. Such a profile may be used or improved later on, on the same or a different website or app to present you with advertising for a particular bike accessory brand. If you also look at a configurator for a vehicle on a luxury car manufacturer website, this information could be combined with your interest in bikes to refine your profile and make an assumption that you are interested in luxury cycling gear.
• An apparel company wishes to promote its new line of high-end baby clothes. It gets in touch with an agency that has a network of clients with high income customers (such as high-end supermarkets) and asks the agency to create profiles of young parents or couples who can be assumed to be wealthy and to have a new child, so that these can later be used to present advertising within partner apps based on those profiles.
• An online retailer wants to advertise a limited sale on running shoes. It wants to target advertising to users who previously looked at running shoes on its mobile app. Tracking technologies might be used to recognise that you have previously used the mobile app to consult running shoes, in order to present you with the corresponding advertisement on the app.
• A profile created for personalised advertising in relation to a person having searched for bike accessories on a website can be used to present the relevant advertisement for bike accessories on a mobile app of another organisation.
• You read several articles on how to build a treehouse on a social media platform. This information might be added to a profile to mark your interest in content related to outdoors as well as do-it-yourself guides (with the objective of allowing the personalisation of content, so that for example you are presented with more blog posts and articles on treehouses and wood cabins in the future).
• You have viewed three videos on space exploration across different TV apps. An unrelated news platform with which you have had no contact builds a profile based on that viewing behaviour, marking space exploration as a topic of possible interest for other videos.
• You read articles on vegetarian food on a social media platform and then use the cooking app of an unrelated company. The profile built about you on the social media platform will be used to present you vegetarian recipes on the welcome screen of the cooking app.
• You have viewed three videos about rowing across different websites. An unrelated video sharing platform will recommend five other videos on rowing that may be of interest to you when you use your TV app, based on a profile built about you when you visited those different websites to watch online videos.
• You have clicked on an advertisement about a “black Friday” discount by an online shop on the website of a publisher and purchased a product. Your click will be linked to this purchase. Your interaction and that of other users will be measured to know how many clicks on the ad led to a purchase.
• You are one of very few to have clicked on an advertisement about an “international appreciation day” discount by an online gift shop within the app of a publisher. The publisher wants to have reports to understand how often a specific ad placement within the app, and notably the “international appreciation day” ad, has been viewed or clicked by you and other users, in order to help the publisher and its partners (such as agencies) optimise ad placements.
• You have read a blog post about hiking on a mobile app of a publisher and followed a link to a recommended and related post. Your interactions will be recorded as showing that the initial hiking post was useful to you and that it was successful in interesting you in the related post. This will be measured to know whether to produce more posts on hiking in the future and where to place them on the home screen of the mobile app.
• You were presented a video on fashion trends, but you and several other users stopped watching after 30 seconds. This information is then used to evaluate the right length of future videos on fashion trends.
• The owner of an online bookstore wants commercial reporting showing the proportion of visitors who consulted and left its site without buying, or consulted and bought the last celebrity autobiography of the month, as well as the average age and the male/female distribution of each category. Data relating to your navigation on its site and to your personal characteristics is then used and combined with other such data to produce these statistics.
• An advertiser wants to better understand the type of audience interacting with its adverts. It calls upon a research institute to compare the characteristics of users who interacted with the ad with typical attributes of users of similar platforms, across different devices. This comparison reveals to the advertiser that its ad audience is mainly accessing the adverts through mobile devices and is likely in the 45-60 age range.
• A technology platform working with a social media provider notices a growth in mobile app users, and sees based on their profiles that many of them are connecting through mobile connections. It uses a new technology to deliver ads that are formatted for mobile devices and that are low-bandwidth, to improve their performance.
• An advertiser is looking for a way to display ads on a new type of consumer device. It collects information regarding the way users interact with this new kind of device to determine whether it can build a new mechanism for displaying advertising on this type of device.
• A travel magazine has published an article on its website about the new online courses proposed by a language school, to improve travelling experiences abroad. The school’s blog posts are inserted directly at the bottom of the page, and selected on the basis of your non-precise location (for instance, blog posts explaining the course curriculum for different languages than the language of the country you are situated in).
• A sports news mobile app has started a new section of articles covering the most recent football games. Each article includes videos hosted by a separate streaming platform showcasing the highlights of each match. If you fast-forward a video, this information may be used to select a shorter video to play next.
• An advertising intermediary delivers ads from various advertisers to its network of partnering websites. It notices a large increase in clicks on ads relating to one advertiser, and uses data regarding the source of the clicks to determine that 80% of the clicks come from bots rather than humans.
• Clicking on a link in an article might normally send you to another page or part of the article. To achieve this, 1°) your browser sends a request to a server linked to the website, 2°) the server answers back (“here is the article you asked for”), using technical information automatically included in the request sent by your device, to properly display the information / images that are part of the article you asked for. Technically, such exchange of information is necessary to deliver the content that appears on your screen.
• Store and/or access information on a device
• Use limited data to select advertising
• Create profiles for personalised advertising
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising
• Measure advertising performance
• Measure content performance
• Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources
• Develop and improve services
• Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors
• Deliver and present advertising and content
• Match and combine data from other data sources
• Link different devices
• Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically
• IP addresses
• Device identifiers
• Probabilistic identifiers
• Browsing and interaction data
• Non-precise location data
• Users’ profiles
• Privacy choices
• Tracking method : Cookies
• Maximum duration of cookies : 90 days
• Cookie lifetime is being refreshed
• Actively scan device characteristics for identification
• Device characteristics
• Tracking method : Cookies and others.
• Maximum duration of cookies : 365 days
• Use precise geolocation data
• Authentication-derived identifiers
• Precise location data
• Maximum duration of cookies : 30 days
• Cookie lifetime is not being refreshed
• Measure advertising performance ( Data Retention Period : 90 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 395 days
• User-provided data
• Maximum duration of cookies : 396 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 394 days
• Create profiles to personalise content
• Maximum duration of cookies : 17 days
• Use profiles to select personalised content
• Use limited data to select content
• Maximum duration of cookies : 540 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 3628 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 180 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 183 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 397 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 182 days
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 180 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 390 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 3650 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 45 days
• Create profiles for personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 365 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 365 days )
• Measure advertising performance ( Data Retention Period : 365 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 730 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 720 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 21 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 2555 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 400 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 273 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 60 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 393 days
• Create profiles for personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 90 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 90 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 390 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 2190 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 364 days
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 4320 days )
• Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources ( Data Retention Period : 90 days )
• Develop and improve services ( Data Retention Period : 90 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 366 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 120 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 403 days
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 0 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 729 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 62 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 1825 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 25 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 0 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 1 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 50 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 14 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 913 days
• Create profiles for personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 395 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 395 days )
• Create profiles to personalise content ( Data Retention Period : 395 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised content ( Data Retention Period : 395 days )
• Measure advertising performance ( Data Retention Period : 395 days )
• Measure content performance ( Data Retention Period : 1125 days )
• Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources ( Data Retention Period : 1125 days )
• Develop and improve services ( Data Retention Period : 1125 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 18 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 93 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 386 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 89 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 1095 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 500 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 91 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 912 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 370 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 9 days
• Create profiles for personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 10 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 360 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 15 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 31 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 1157 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 30000 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 7 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 730000 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 300 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 28 days
• Use profiles to select personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 7 days )
• Measure advertising performance ( Data Retention Period : 7 days )
• Create profiles for personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 0 days )
• Create profiles to personalise content ( Data Retention Period : 0 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised content ( Data Retention Period : 0 days )
• Measure advertising performance ( Data Retention Period : 0 days )
• Measure content performance ( Data Retention Period : 730 days )
• Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources ( Data Retention Period : 730 days )
• Develop and improve services ( Data Retention Period : 730 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 2485 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 2 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 4 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 146 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 13 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 356 days
• Create profiles for personalised advertising ( Data Retention Period : 180 days )
• Create profiles to personalise content ( Data Retention Period : 90 days )
• Develop and improve services ( Data Retention Period : 120 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 358 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 57 days
• Create profiles to personalise content ( Data Retention Period : 91 days )
• Use profiles to select personalised content ( Data Retention Period : 91 days )
• Measure advertising performance ( Data Retention Period : 91 days )
• Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources ( Data Retention Period : 91 days )
• Develop and improve services ( Data Retention Period : 4320 days )
• Maximum duration of cookies : 3652 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 56 days
• Maximum duration of cookies : 3000 days

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek Madone 5.2 Road Bike

• OCLV 120 Carbon Frame
• Bontrager Race X Lite
• OCLV 120 Carbon Fork
• Bontrager Race Lite Wheels
• Shimano Ultegra Rear Derailleur
• USER REVIEWS

Light, stiff, gives back the power you put in. Low. Long-lasting. I am writing about the Madone from about 2007 which has a horizontal top bar. I bought it from the Japanese equivalent of ebay because I wanted a bike with a short head tube. Rider body drag is the biggest component of drag apparently at about 60% of total drag, so rather than an aero frame with can shave a percent or two off the 9% of frame drag with a modern aero frame, I would rather get down a degree or two or ten lower, especially now that I have worked out how cyclists used to pedal: forwards and backwards, rather than the current stomp stomp, which makes it much easier to get down low. The other advantage of a low "non-compact" frame is that it forces me to cognise my belly fat. It is like wearing tight jeans. You know when you have eaten too much the day before. This is my second low "aggressive" frame. My other is a Look KG 386 with a similar sized (less than 14cm in the medium 54cm size) head tube. The French Look has a perfectly damped feel. When I go over a bump in the road the vertical movement disappears in a swiftly diminishing suave sinusoid. This Trek however has more bounce. I go over a bump in the road and it almost feels like I am going to take off. The difference in springiness is an advantage however when it comes to pedalling. The Look feels like it is absorbing some of the power I put into the cranks whereas the Trek makes me feel like all power in bounces back. It has more mechanical machismo making the Look feel like a sophisticated stale baguette.

A little bit bouncy. If you don't use the shifters the grease inside may get sticky preventing you from changing down the cassette to the highest gear. Rinsing with lots of brake cleaner and relubricating with a PTF containing lubricant should get the shifters clicking again.

Very smooth and overall sturdy bike for mountain riding and even just casual riding throughout the day. Definitely recommend to anything with an interest or hobby in bike riding. It withstood the test of wear and tear when I used to ride to project sites for my Brick Pavers business.

None that I can think of.

ood smooth shifters. Big wheels, ideal for cruising at high speed. Shocks eat up bumps. Well built. Repositionable handlebars. Good on flat roads, has decent off-road capabilities too. Bakersfield Pro Concrete Pumping

None so far.

Great choice of bike. Light weight, very stiff and good handling. Never encountered trouble for almost a year upon purchasing. Highly recommended from Bathroom Tile Company.

Price? Not really. Let’s be honest, I didn’t have to get a Madone, I chose to get a Madone and isometimes you have to pay to play. Bike is actually a 2006.

custom stickers | print stickers | business printing | printing company

Excellent handling bike that rolls with very little road buzz.

This bike is extremely maintenance intensive due to design flaws in the bottom bracket and headset. It is worse than owning a Porsche or a British sports car and I've owned both and worked on both. You're looking at overhauling the BB at 500-750 mile intervals and replacing the non-drive side bearing at the least. This bike had so many overhauls over 13K miles that even the oversize bearings were too loose a fit. You're looking at 1500-1800 mile interval for the headset and replacing the upper bearing if not both. You definitely better learn how to work on your bike or you're going to be spending $$$'s at the bike shops. The wheels are a low quality wheelset and I ended up having to replace the wheelset after less than 3K miles. After finding numerous flaws with the bike Trek FINALLY replaced it with another model.

great bike second bike i have got first worth 200£ it reacts to everything in ease and speed.

Has a noise to it don't no where its coming from sounds like the seat thats it

just bought this bike it was on sale in intersport 50% off 3450€ to 1700€ it had ben sat there for two years. great find oct 2016 Very Light Reactive for speed sprint I've been riding now 4 months and have my avenge to 35ks an hour live in france lots of hills Limoges started off average 22ks got to 28ks but flying now. recommend to anyone

Strong, solid, well-built and designed machine

As everyone else has mentioned, the saddle stinks. In fact, I can't imagine a normal human being being comfortable on the thing. That being said, think of a saddle as a pair of shoes. You'll want to find something more specific to YOU! As far as the bike itself, it's wonderful! TREK consistently designes equipment that's superior to most. They also stand behind what they make in ways that many don't. I have a little over 10,000 miles on my Madone, and have replaced only tires and the bottom bracket (-bottom bracket at 8500 miles). Both of these components are "expendables". There are "heavy-duty" brackets that you can use, but then the emphasis is on heavy. Be content with the standard set. This is not my first Trek. They've never disappointed, and this Madone is no exception. It's stable and dependable, with no kinky surprises that you discover on some fast downhill (-had this happen once on another brand). You won't be disappointed. -Oh, and I'm a 69 year old veteran rider with a lifetime of riding experience (-still have yet to find that hidden motor that so many talk about).

Similar Products Used:

Giant, Fuji, and many others

The performance is great on this bike. Light, stiff and very responsive. A great bike to ride.

I replace the Bontrager wheelset after about 10K miles with a Flo 30 wheelset. Seat mast kept slipping till the shop finally used a special grease and discovered that the seat mast bolt should be torqued to 7 N instead of 5 N. The bottom bracket is the biggest weakness of the bike. My bearings lasted about 500-600 miles and you have to overhaul the BB about every one to two months or after riding in the rain. In fact, I won't even ride it when the roads are wet due to having to O/H the BB. A new Trek bearing set with a dust seal got about 800+ miles if overhauled at about 400 miles. Now the frame cups have worn to the point where I now need special Trek oversized brackets.

Performance is outstanding, but I can't give it a high score because of the serious design flaw of the bottom bracket and the poor wheelset. The BB makes for a much more maintenance intensive bike.

Light Weight, very stiff and an all round option

Wheelset, bontrager stock saddle and little bit of shifting issues

My first bike and am overall very happy since I have switched to carbon wheels, it is a good all round bike fast on the flats and climbs well as well. Trek should have given saddle options as the stock bontrager is a waste. Changing it with Selle SMP. Shifting needs minor adjustments many a times on the fly

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• Help Center
• Chat with a Ride Guide
• 1-866-401-9636
• Retail Store
• Bike Services

Reset Password

We will send you an email to reset your password.

Don't have an account? Create an account

Create Account

Already have an account? Sign In

• Favorite your products & save them to your account
• Save a search & get notified when new products drop
• Be first to know about the latest events & promotions

Bike Finder

Results have arrived, trek madone 5.2 large road bike - 2011, item #brd10786, condition: pre-owned used condition with signs of use but functions as intended. backed by tpc's risk-free return policy., fit range: 5'8" - 5'11" sizing guide.

Our RideFast shipping means this bike gets to you quickly and securely. Domestic US ground rates are a flat $135 for regular bikes or $150 for e-bikes.

Quick Assembly

• Bikes arrive tuned and mostly pre-assembled
• Torque tool & video guide included
• Get riding in 15 minutes

Canadian Customers

Please note that any duties, taxes, or surcharges as required by Canadian customs and provincial authorities will be the buyer's responsibility. Shipping to Canadian addresses may take longer than expected due to customs.

30-Day Returns

If this bike isn't perfect for you, our Ride Guides will help you find the right one.

Added to Cart

Changing the way cyclists buy bikes.

Who is tpc.

We’re fellow bike nerds. We're cyclists who want to find the right bike, components, and accessories for you. That’s why we created our innovative Certified Pre-Owned bike process and why we’re committed to finding the best products you need for your adventures.

Bikes are meant to be used.

Ask a Ride Guide about this

Sizing guide.

The chart below provides a general suggested range of heights and is not exact. Sizing may vary across brands.

The tailoring of any bike is an important step in the long term enjoyment of riding and it can take time to adjust to the fit of a new bike. All contact points (pedals, shoes, and saddle) can be changed and altered for personal preference, performance, and comfort.

Contact our Ride Guides if you have any questions about the fit of your new bike.

866.401.9636 - Contact the Ride Guides

Purchase your next bike with the same confidence you would when buying new. We scrutinize age, condition, and quality. If a bike meets the standard, our pro tune and service will guarantee that your ride will be in pristine condition when it arrives at your door.

• MAGAZINE OFFERS
• BIKE INSURANCE
• Best Products
• Maintenance
• Accessories
• Long-Term Reviews
• BikeRadar Podcast
• First Look Friday
• Bike of the Week
• Tech Features
• Routes and Rides
• Bike Galleries
• BikeRadar Bargains
• Buyer's Guides
• Fitness & Training
• Sizing & Fit
• Mountain Biking UK
• Cycling Plus

Trek Madone 5.2 (09) review

Trek Madone 5.2 (09)

Share this article

• Terms & Conditions
• Subscribe to our magazines
• Manage preferences

Current time by city

For example, New York

Current time by country

For example, Japan

Time difference

For example, London

For example, Dubai

Coordinates

For example, Hong Kong

For example, Delhi

For example, Sydney

Geographic coordinates of Elektrostal, Moscow Oblast, Russia

City coordinates

Coordinates of Elektrostal in decimal degrees

Coordinates of elektrostal in degrees and decimal minutes, utm coordinates of elektrostal, geographic coordinate systems.

WGS 84 coordinate reference system is the latest revision of the World Geodetic System, which is used in mapping and navigation, including GPS satellite navigation system (the Global Positioning System).

Geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) define a position on the Earth’s surface. Coordinates are angular units. The canonical form of latitude and longitude representation uses degrees (°), minutes (′), and seconds (″). GPS systems widely use coordinates in degrees and decimal minutes, or in decimal degrees.

Latitude varies from −90° to 90°. The latitude of the Equator is 0°; the latitude of the South Pole is −90°; the latitude of the North Pole is 90°. Positive latitude values correspond to the geographic locations north of the Equator (abbrev. N). Negative latitude values correspond to the geographic locations south of the Equator (abbrev. S).

Longitude is counted from the prime meridian ( IERS Reference Meridian for WGS 84) and varies from −180° to 180°. Positive longitude values correspond to the geographic locations east of the prime meridian (abbrev. E). Negative longitude values correspond to the geographic locations west of the prime meridian (abbrev. W).

UTM or Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system divides the Earth’s surface into 60 longitudinal zones. The coordinates of a location within each zone are defined as a planar coordinate pair related to the intersection of the equator and the zone’s central meridian, and measured in meters.

Elevation above sea level is a measure of a geographic location’s height. We are using the global digital elevation model GTOPO30 .

Elektrostal , Moscow Oblast, Russia