Sainsburys Bank Travel Insurance

  • Select cover
  • Extra cover
  • Your details

Before you buy

It is essential that you check the latest FCDO advice for your destination before you travel. Our travel insurance policies do not provide cover for travel to an area where the FCDO advises against all or all but essential travel unless you purchase our optional Enhanced Covid-19 cover that will protect you if the advice is given solely as a result of Covid 19.

Stay up-to-date with the latest rules:

  • The green list
  • The amber list
  • The red list

Please continue to check our FAQ's regularly which will contain the latest guidance.

For existing customers, you can click here to manage your policy .

It is essential that you check the latest FCDO advice for your destination before you travel. Our travel insurance policies do not provide cover for travel to an area where the FCDO advises against all or all but essential travel.

All fields marked with * must be completed.

Please take care to answer all the questions accurately and completely. If you don't, we may cancel your policy and we may reject any claims, or not pay them in full.

Up to 20%* discount with your Nectar card.

Tooltip

Cruise cover is not covered on our Annual multi trip policies: If you are travelling on a cruise, please purchase a Single trip policy and select the Cruise cover add on.

Important: For Annual multi trip policies you will not be covered for holiday cancellation until your policy start date. Please choose today's date if you want cover as soon as possible.

Tooltip

Medical declarations Your travel insurance policy can cover some pre-existing medical conditions

Please declare any pre-existing medical conditions that you or anyone travelling on this policy have. By answering them, you confirm you have the authority and will provide complete and accurate medical information about everyone to be covered. If you are unsure of any answers please contact the person who you answering on behalf of. If you don't declare pre-existing medical conditions, it may result in part or all of a claim not being paid.

Nectar and promotional codes

Nectar Card

Have you got a promotional code?

By clicking the button below you are confirming that you have read, understand and meet our eligibility conditions .

Eligibility conditions

You confirm that:

  • You are 18 years of age or over at the date of buying the policy
  • You and all persons to be insured have an address in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man
  • You and all persons to be insured have lived in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man for at least 6 of the last 12 months
  • You and all persons to be insured are registered with a GP in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man
  • You and all persons to be insured are in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands or the Isle of Man when the policy is purchased and have not started a trip
  • You and all persons to be insured will obtain any recommended vaccines, inoculations, or medications prior to your trip.

Customers with more serious pre-existing medical conditions

Our travel insurance can offer cover for many pre-existing medical conditions. However, if we were unable to provide you with a quote, or if you would like an alternative quote for your medical condition(s), you can access a directory of specialist medical travel insurers who may be able to arrange cover. You can access this by clicking here or by calling 0800 138 7777 .

Important information

Nectar benefits.

*Customers receive a 20% discount when entering your Nectar card number. Excluding pre-existing medical and Enhanced gadget premiums.

Defaqto 5 star travel cover

Our Comprehensive Travel Insurance policies carry a 5 Star rating from Defaqto, which is the highest rating possible on the market.

Defaqto rating 5 stars

Our team are here to help:

Monday to Friday 8am-7pm Saturday 9am-5pm Sunday and Bank Holidays Closed

Telephone calls may be recorded for security purposes under our quality control procedures. Calls are charged at local rates from landlines and mobiles.

U.S. News takes an unbiased approach to our recommendations. When you use our links to buy products, we may earn a commission but that in no way affects our editorial independence.

The 5 Best COVID-19 Travel Insurance Options

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Travelex Insurance Services »

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Allianz Travel Insurance »

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

World Nomads Travel Insurance »

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Generali Global Assistance »

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

IMG Travel Insurance »

Why Trust Us

U.S. News evaluates ratings, data and scores of more than 50 travel insurance companies from comparison websites like TravelInsurance.com, Squaremouth and InsureMyTrip, plus renowned credit rating agency AM Best, in addition to reviews and recommendations from top travel industry sources and consumers to determine the Best COVID Travel Insurance Options.

Table of Contents

  • Rating Details
  • Travelex Insurance Services
  • Allianz Travel Insurance

Even though COVID-19 is no longer considered a global emergency, concerns around illness-related costs remain for many travelers. If you're looking for travel insurance that covers COVID – as well as other potential disruptions like flight delays and lost luggage – these are your best options.

  • Travelex Insurance Services: Best Optional Coverage Add-ons
  • Allianz Travel Insurance: Best for Multitrip and Annual Plans
  • World Nomads Travel Insurance: Best for Active Travelers
  • Generali Global Assistance: Best for Comprehensive Travel Insurance
  • IMG Travel Insurance: Best for Travel Medical Insurance

Best COVID Travel Insurance Options in Detail

Plans include coverage for COVID-19

Optional CFAR coverage is available with Travel Select plan

Some coverages require an upgrade, including rental car collision, accidental death and dismemberment, and more

Not all add-ons are available with every plan

Allianz offers some travel insurance plans that come with an epidemic coverage endorsement

Single-trip, multitrip and annual plans available

COVID-19 benefits don't apply to every plan

Low coverage limits with some plans (e.g., only $10,000 in emergency medical coverage with OneTrip Basic plan)

24-hour travel assistance services included

More than 200 sports and activities covered in every plan

Low trip cancellation benefits ($2,500 maximum) with Standard plan

No CFAR option is offered

Free 10-day trial period

Some coverage limits may be insufficient

Rental car damage coverage only included in top-tier Premium plan

Offers travel medical insurance, international travel health insurance and general travel insurance plans

Some plans include robust coverage for testing and quarantine due to COVID-19

Not all plans from IMG offer coverage for COVID-19

Cancel for any reason coverage not available with every plan

Frequently Asked Questions

When comparing COVID-19 travel insurance options, you'll want to make sure you fully understand the coverages included in each plan. For example, you should know the policy inclusions and limits for COVID-related claims, including coverage for testing, treatments, trip cancellation or COVID-related interruptions that can occur. Meanwhile, you should understand how your coverage will work if you contract some other illness while away from home.

Also ensure your travel insurance coverage will kick in for other mishaps that occur, and that limits are sufficient for your needs. If you're planning a trip to a remote area in a country like Costa Rica or Peru , you'll want to have emergency evacuation and transportation coverage with generous limits that can pay for emergency transportation to a hospital if you need treatment.

You can also invest in a travel insurance policy that offers cancel for any reason coverage. This type of travel insurance plan lets you cancel and get a percentage of your prepaid travel expenses back for any reason, even if you just decide you're better off staying home.

It depends on your private health insurance provider and/or travel insurance policy. As of May 11, 2023, private health insurers are no longer required to cover the cost of COVID-19 testing. Out-of-pocket costs for COVID-19 test kits at local drugstores and on Amazon are relatively affordable, however.

As you search for plans that will provide sufficient coverage for your next trip, you'll find travel insurance that covers COVID-19 quarantine both inside and outside the United States. However, you'll typically need to have your condition certified by a physician in order for this coverage to apply. Also make sure your travel insurance plan includes coverage for travel claims related to COVID-19 in the first place.

Many travel insurance plans do cover trip cancellation as a result of COVID-19, although the terms vary widely. You typically need to be certified by a physician in order to prove your condition. Disinclination to travel because of COVID-19 – such as fear of exposure to illness – will generally not be covered. This means you will actually have to test positive for coronavirus for benefits to apply; simply not wanting to travel is not a sufficient reason to make a claim.

If you want more flexibility in your COVID-19 travel insurance, ensuring you have a cancel for any reason policy may be your best bet, but be sure to check with your chosen travel insurance provider to assess your options.

Why Trust U.S. News Travel

Holly Johnson is an award-winning writer who has been covering travel insurance and travel for more than a decade. She has researched the best travel insurance options for her own trips to more than 50 countries around the world and has experience navigating the claims and reimbursement process. Over the years, Johnson has successfully filed several travel insurance claims for trip delays and trip cancellations. Johnson also works alongside her travel agent partner, Greg, who has been licensed to sell travel insurance in 50 states.

You might also be interested in:

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

5 Best Travel Insurance Plans for Seniors (Medical & More)

Holly Johnson

Discover coverage options for peace of mind while traveling.

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Does My Health Insurance Cover International Travel?

Private health insurance typically doesn't cover international travel expenses.

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

9 Cheapest Travel Insurance Companies Worth the Cost

U.S. News rates the cheapest travel insurance options, considering pricing data, expert recommendations and consumer reviews.

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Is Travel Insurance Worth It? Yes, in These 3 Scenarios

These are the scenarios when travel insurance makes most sense.

  • Credit cards
  • View all credit cards
  • Banking guide
  • Loans guide
  • Insurance guide
  • Personal finance
  • View all personal finance
  • Small business
  • Small business guide
  • View all taxes

You’re our first priority. Every time.

We believe everyone should be able to make financial decisions with confidence. And while our site doesn’t feature every company or financial product available on the market, we’re proud that the guidance we offer, the information we provide and the tools we create are objective, independent, straightforward — and free.

So how do we make money? Our partners compensate us. This may influence which products we review and write about (and where those products appear on the site), but it in no way affects our recommendations or advice, which are grounded in thousands of hours of research. Our partners cannot pay us to guarantee favorable reviews of their products or services. Here is a list of our partners .

Best COVID-19 Travel Insurance in March 2024

Natasha Etzel

Many or all of the products featured here are from our partners who compensate us. This influences which products we write about and where and how the product appears on a page. However, this does not influence our evaluations. Our opinions are our own. Here is a list of our partners and here's how we make money .

Table of Contents

Factors we considered when picking travel insurance that covers COVID

An overview of the best travel insurance for covid , top travel insurance for covid options , additional resources for covid-19 travel insurance shoppers.

No matter how well you prepare, travel plans don’t always go as expected. Some travelers buy travel insurance to protect their investment in prepaid travel costs. Amid the ongoing pandemic, exploring travel insurance with COVID-19 coverage is recommended. With the right policy, you can protect yourself if you need to cancel your trip or end it early due to illness. Many insurers offer travel insurance policies with this kind of coverage. 

This is the shortlist of the best travel insurance for COVID options: 

Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection . 

John Hancock Insurance Agency, Inc.  

Seven Corners . 

Travelex Insurance Services . 

Travel Insured International . 

WorldTrips . 

We used the following factors to choose insurance providers to highlight in our best travel insurance for COVID list: 

Range of coverage: We looked at how many plans each company offered with COVID-19 coverage, plus the range of available plans. 

Depth of coverage: We compared the maximum caps for trip cancellation and trip interruption claims between carriers and plans.

Medical benefits: We examined whether plans included emergency medical benefits for COVID-19 reasons and whether plans included medical evacuation and repatriation benefits. 

Cost: We determined an average cost for shoppers to benchmark plan prices by looking at the basic coverage costs for plans with COVID-19 benefits across multiple companies.

We looked at quotes from various companies for a six-night trip in May 2023 to Croatia. The traveler was 30 years old, from Texas and planned to spend $1,500 on the trip, including airfare.

On average, the price of each company’s most basic coverage plan with COVID-19 coverage was $47.22. The prices listed below are for the most basic COVID-19 travel insurance coverage. All insurers offer multiple COVID-19 policies with greater coverage coming at a higher cost. 

Let's take a closer look at our eight recommendations for travel insurance with COVID coverage: 

Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection great:

Several plans allow policyholders to cancel for COVID-19 sickness as part of trip cancellation and trip interruption insurance benefits. 

Several plans include COVID-19 medical coverage benefits.

Medical evacuation benefits are included in these plans. 

Plans include limited sports and activities coverage and sports equipment loss benefits. 

Basic Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection will run you $50 for an ExactCare Value policy, the company’s most basic COVID-19 travel insurance coverage option.

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes IMG great:

Many plans include COVID-19 cancellation benefits.

Most of these plans also include COVID-19 medical benefits (the Travel Essentials plan doesn’t include this). 

Medical evacuation coverage is available on select plans. 

Coverage for adventure travel is available for an extra cost. 

IMG is a good option for the budget-minded: Its Travel Essential plans cost more than $10 less than average based on our comparison. 

John Hancock Insurance Agency, Inc. 

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes John Hancock Insurance Agency great:

Multiple plans offer COVID-19 cancellation benefits as part of the included trip interruption and trip cancellation coverage. 

These plans offer COVID-19 medical benefits.

Medical evacuation coverage is included in all COVID-19 coverage plans. 

The John Hancock Insurance Agency, Inc. basic plan (Bronze) costs $56. 

Seven Corners

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes Seven Corners great:

Multiple plans offer COVID-19 cancellation benefits as part of the included trip interruption and trip cancelation coverage. 

These plans include COVID-19 medical benefits and evacuation and repatriation benefits.

There is no medical deductible. 

Seven Corners’ basic coverage plan (RoundTrip Basic) for our trip to Croatia costs $44.

Travelex Insurance Services

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes Travelex Insurance Services great:

Multiple plans include Covid-19 sickness coverage, which reimburses prepaid and nonrefundable trip payments if a trip is canceled or interrupted due to a traveler contracting the virus.

These plans also include COVID-19 medical benefits.

Medical evacuation and repatriation benefits are included. 

Basic coverage (Travel Basic) from Travelex Insurance Services costs $44 for our sample trip, which is slightly cheaper than average. 

Travel Insured International

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes Travel Insured International great:

Multiple plans cover COVID-19 cancellation benefits as part of the included trip interruption and trip cancelation coverage. 

These plans also include COVID-19 medical benefits, including medical evacuation. 

Limited sports and activities coverage is included in plans with COVID-19 coverage. 

Travel Insured International's basic coverage (Worldwide Trip Protector Edge) begins at $55 — only a few dollars more than the average basic policy price. 

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes Tin Leg great:

A wide range of plans offer COVID-19 cancellation benefits as part of the included trip interruption and trip cancelation coverage. 

All of these plans also include COVID-19 medical benefits. 

All of these include medical evacuation benefits. 

An adventure travel policy is available. 

Another plus: Tin Leg’s basic coverage plan (Basic) for our trip to Croatia costs $48.85 — making it right around the average price for the policies we covered. 

WorldTrips 

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

What makes WorldTrips great:

Several plans include medical coverage for COVID-19. 

Sports and activities and sports equipment loss are included. 

Coverage can be extended for up to thirty days, including for medical quarantine purposes. 

WorldTrips’ most affordable plan with COVID-19 coverage (Atlas Journey Economy) starts at $44, making it a low-cost option. 

Do you want to learn more about travel insurance before you spend money on a policy? Take a look at these resources: 

What is travel insurance?  

What does travel insurance cover? 

The best travel insurance companies 

How to find the right travel insurance for you

10 credit cards that provide travel insurance

How to maximize your rewards

You want a travel credit card that prioritizes what’s important to you. Here are our picks for the best travel credit cards of 2024 , including those best for:

Flexibility, point transfers and a large bonus: Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card

No annual fee: Bank of America® Travel Rewards credit card

Flat-rate travel rewards: Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card

Bonus travel rewards and high-end perks: Chase Sapphire Reserve®

Luxury perks: The Platinum Card® from American Express

Business travelers: Ink Business Preferred® Credit Card

Chase Sapphire Reserve Credit Card

on Chase's website

1x-10x Earn 5x total points on flights and 10x total points on hotels and car rentals when you purchase travel through Chase Ultimate Rewards® immediately after the first $300 is spent on travel purchases annually. Earn 3x points on other travel and dining & 1 point per $1 spent on all other purchases

60,000 Earn 60,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $900 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®.

Chase Sapphire Preferred Credit Card

1x-5x 5x on travel purchased through Chase Ultimate Rewards®, 3x on dining, select streaming services and online groceries, 2x on all other travel purchases, 1x on all other purchases.

60,000 Earn 60,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $750 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®.

Chase Southwest Rapid Rewards® Plus Credit Card

1x-2x Earn 2X points on Southwest® purchases. Earn 2X points on local transit and commuting, including rideshare. Earn 2X points on internet, cable, and phone services, and select streaming. Earn 1X points on all other purchases.

30,000 Limited-time offer: Earn Companion Pass® good through 2/28/25 plus 30,000 points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening.

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Cards, Loans & Savings

Car & home insurance, pet insurance, travel insurance, travel money card, life insurance.

Travel insurance with medical condition cover

Travel insurance with medical condition cover

Underwritten by Great Lakes Insurance UK Limited

Retrieve saved details

What is a pre-existing medical condition?

When talking in travel insurance terms, a pre-existing medical condition is defined as an injury, illness, disease or other medical condition that happens before your trip starts. Some insurers will exclude these from your policy and won’t cover the related costs.

But we can tailor your travel insurance to cover many pre-existing medical conditions, including diabetes, heart conditions, epilepsy, high blood pressure and asthma depending on screening.

Why choose Sainsbury’s Bank?

  • Nectar members save up to 20% on all travel insurance policies. This discount doesn't apply to premiums for pre-existing medical conditions or enhanced gadget cover.*
  • Choose from Silver or our 5 star Defaqto rated Gold or Platinum cover
  • Cover for unlimited medical expenses if you choose Platinum annual or single trip cover
  • 24/7 helpline available in case of medical emergencies
  • Cover for a wide range of pre-existing medical conditions  
  • COVID as standard more info

Which policy is right for you?

While all our travel insurance policies have some sort of medical cover for emergencies, it’s important that you let us know about any pre-existing conditions upfront.

You could get cover for pre-existing medical conditions with any of our travel insurance policies. Simply choose the one that suits you best. And remember to tell us about any conditions before you get a quote.

Limits, exclusions and excesses apply.

Single trip

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

Travel disruption

Add our optional travel disruption cover to your policy to help provide additional protection.

Losing documents abroad

Losing documents abroad

Take steps to prevent the stress of losing your passport or driving license whilst abroad.

Planning a solo trip

Solo travel guide

Planning a solo trip? Read our guide to travelling alone.

Any questions?  

You can get in touch with our friendly team to speak about our travel insurance policies by calling  0345 305 2621 ^..

^Sales and service lines are open 9am-5pm Monday to Friday. We're closed weekends and Bank Holidays. Calls may be monitored or recorded and are charged at local rates from landlines and mobiles.

Helpful phone numbers

Terms and conditions

*Up to 20% discount applies when you tell us your Nectar card number. Discount does not apply to premiums for pre-existing medical conditions or enhanced gadget cover. You won't be eligible if you buy through a price comparison website. We reserve the right to change or cancel this offer without notice.

** Telephone calls may be recorded for security purposes and monitored under our quality control procedures.

Sainsbury’s Bank Travel Insurance is underwritten by Great Lakes Insurance UK Limited. Great Lakes Insurance UK Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales with company number 13436330 and whose registered office address is 10 Fenchurch Avenue, London, United Kingdom, EC3M 5BN. Great Lakes Insurance UK Limited is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Firm Reference Number 955859. You can check this on the Financial Services Register by visiting; register.fca.org.uk.

Sainsbury’s Bank Travel Insurance is sold and administered by Hood Travel Limited, registered at Companies House 08318836. Hood Travel is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under registration number 597211. Hood Travel Limited’s registered address is at 2nd Floor, Decora Court, Tylers Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex, SS1 2BB.

Advertisement

Struggling with rising cases and low vaccination rates, Moscow announces a lockdown.

Like many countries, Russia has seesawed between tighter and looser pandemic restrictions. As the coronavirus claims more victims, the pendulum is now swinging toward tightening.

  • Share full article

sainsbury's travel insurance covid

By Andrew E. Kramer

  • Oct. 21, 2021

MOSCOW — Schools, shops and restaurants in the city of Moscow will close next week, municipal officials said, in one of the tightest lockdowns in the Russian capital since the pandemic began, a measure made necessary by low vaccination rates.

Russia’s coronavirus response, like that of many other countries, has seesawed between strict controls and lax enforcement of mask-wearing and vaccination rules. Russia pivoted again this week toward tighter lockdowns as reports of new cases and Covid-19 deaths climbed.

Reported cases are up 33 percent over the last two weeks, reaching more than 32,400, according to a New York Times database . And on average over the past week, 983 people a day died from the coronavirus ; on some days that number exceeded 1,000. Only Russian-made coronavirus vaccines are available in the country, and many people are hesitant to get them. Russia’s vaccination rate of 33 percent of the population is lower than the global average of 37 percent and far behind the rates in most of Europe.

To combat the surge in cases and deaths, President Vladimir V. Putin on Wednesday declared a countrywide “nonworking” week from Oct. 30 to Nov. 7 , extending a regular fall holiday by several days. The restrictions the city of Moscow announced on Thursday were even stricter.

Mayor Sergey Sobyanin ordered schools and nonessential businesses to close two days sooner, starting on Oct. 28. He said in a statement posted online that the spread of the virus had gone “by the worst scenario” and that Moscow would soon be setting daily records for new cases.

Early in the pandemic, Moscow locked down more strictly than many Western countries did. Residents were prohibited from leaving their apartments other than to shop at grocery stores or pharmacies, attend medical appointments or walk their dogs.

The city also lifted many restrictions this year before other European countries did on a wide scale, a move that became a point of pride. Mr. Putin contrasted Moscow’s bustling restaurants with the continuing lockdowns abroad.

Over the summer, Moscow imposed, but then dropped, a requirement that patrons be vaccinated to eat in some restaurants or to visit bars. Enforcement of mask-wearing rules in Russia is generally lax.

Andrew E. Kramer is a reporter based in the Moscow bureau. He was part of a team that won the 2017 Pulitzer Prize in International Reporting for a series on Russia’s covert projection of power. More about Andrew E. Kramer

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Logo of pheblackwell

Personal privacy VS. public safety: A hybrid model of the use of smart city solutions in fighting the COVID‐19 pandemic in Moscow

Sergey a. revyakin.

1 HSE University, Moscow Russia

Associated Data

Data derived from public domain resources.

Technological advancements and big data have brought many improvements to smart city infrastructure. During the COVID‐19 outbreak, smart city technologies were considered one of the most effective means of fighting the pandemic. The use of technology, however, implies collecting, processing personal data, and making the collected data publicly available which may violate privacy. While some countries were able to freely use these technologies to fight the pandemic, many others were restricted by their privacy protection legislation. The literature suggests looking for an approach that will allow the effective use of smart city technologies during the pandemic, while complying with strict privacy protection legislation. This article explores the approach applied in Moscow, Russia, and demonstrates the existence of a hybrid model that might be considered a suitable tradeoff between personal privacy and public health. This study contributes to the literature on the role of smart city technologies during pandemics and other emergencies.

1. INTRODUCTION

Along with effective urban management, smart city technologies are useful for effective emergency management (Ekman,  2019 ; Liu & Li,  2020 ). The COVID‐19 outbreak and the associated government restrictions triggered a significant increase in the use of smart city technologies to fight the pandemic (Inn,  2020 ; Markotkin,  2021 ). According to the literature (Inn,  2020 ; WHO,  2019 ), smart city technologies can be useful in identifying, tracking, and forecasting outbreaks through big data analytics, enhancing public security via improved facial recognition and infrared technologies, delivering supplies, and assisting surveillance. The investment in smart city technologies improved the quality of planning, preparation, and forecasting during the pandemic (Sharifi et al.,  2021 ).

The benefits of using smart city technologies are evident, however, the municipalities of many countries can not use such technologies to the fullest to fight the pandemic because they raise concerns about the “erosion of privacy” and could violate privacy protection regulations (Kummitha,  2020 ). That is why such countries have to apply the restrictions on using these technologies, applying “a human‐driven” approach (Kummitha,  2020 ; Kupferschmidt & Cohen,  2020 ). Some other countries were able to immediately and forcefully activate the full capacity of smart city technologies to keep the pandemic under control by applying “the techno‐driven” approach. The literature describes the pros and cons of these approaches when using smart city technologies during pandemics but advises looking for a tradeoff between personal privacy and public safety (Kitchin,  2020 ). The article demonstrates one of those tradeoffs represented by a hybrid approach applied in Moscow. Based on the above and considering that Moscow has the most advanced smart city technologies in Russia and strict privacy regulations at the same time, the article answers the following research question: How did Moscow use its smart city technologies to fight against COVID‐19?

To answer the research question, the author studied the literature, government reports and decrees, WHO reports, newspaper articles, other websites, and tested the functionality of the federal and Moscow authorities' mobile applications. The key finding of the research is that Moscow adopted a hybrid approach that combines the features of both the human‐driven and techno‐driven approaches. That approach has not been described in the literature and could be considered as a potential compromise between the concerns about the privacy of individuals and public safety. This approach could be applied by other countries with strict privacy regulations. The article also proposes a qualification matrix, which can be used to define the type of approach applied by a municipality.

The article is organized as follows. The second section contains a literature review aimed at developing qualification criteria to distinguish between human‐driven and technology‐driven approaches to using smart city technologies and define which smart city devices support specific types of government measures (active surveillance, issuing warnings, identification of the infected, isolation, lockdown, and quarantine). The third section describes the research methodology, while the fourth section describes the results (the approach adopted by Moscow authorities). The fifth section contains the overall discussion and considers the theoretical and practical implications of this research and suggests areas for future study. The sixth section provides conclusions and limitations.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. techno‐and human‐driven approaches during a pandemic: criteria for qualification.

A smart city requires collecting and integrating data obtained from sensors, physical devices, software applications, personal cameras, the Internet, smartphones, and similar devices (Quijano‐Sánchez et al.,  2020 ) for further analysis using artificial intelligence algorithms. It requires opening the data for public consideration to increase the transparency on the virus outbreak, which would decrease privacy (Janssen & van den Hoven,  2015 ). In countries with advanced privacy protection regulations, the use of smart city technologies to track people during the pandemic were perceived as a significant increase in digital control (Markotkin,  2021 ) and a form of government overreach (The Wall Street Journal,  2020 ). The literature suggests that the free flow of information and data collection makes the technology work effectively (Kummitha,  2020 ), but “the challenge is how much data is enough”? (The New York Times,  2020a ). When looking for trade‐offs, this is one of the critical questions to be theoretically explored and practically addressed using liberty‐friendly principles of the adoption of technologies (Kitchin,  2020 ).

In line with the difference between “technology‐push” and “demand‐pull” theories of social change and technological innovation (Kim & Lee,  2009 ), Kummitha ( 2020 ) suggested the key differences between the two approaches to using smart city technologies during a pandemic (Table  1 ).

The key differences between Techno‐ and Human‐driven approaches during a pandemic: criteria for qualification

The approach to using smart city technologies during a pandemic represents a type of the decision the authorities need to make. That means, within the same technological equipment the decision made (the approach applied) could be different. The techno‐driven approach suggests the immediate and forceful use of the full capacity of smart city technologies to keep the pandemic under control. It requires the synchronization and replication at all levels of government at once (Kummitha,  2020 ) as well as the collection and the use of citizens' data (Cabestan,  2020 ). China was the first country that used smart city technologies to track citizens, which was solely aimed at fighting the pandemic (Selinger,  2020 ). The activation of all the technologies available in smart cities allowed the Chinese government to apply effective non‐pharmaceutical measures to stop the spread of COVID‐19 (Kummitha,  2020 ). As reported by The Wall Street Journal, “in South Korea, investigators scan smartphone data to find within 10 min people who might have caught coronavirus from someone they met. Israel has tapped its Shin Bet intelligence unit, usually focused on terrorism, to track down potential coronavirus patients through telecom data”. (The Wall Street Journal,  2020 ). The techno‐driven approach requires citizens to follow the protocols and does not consider the context (Janssen & Kuk,  2016 ). This is one of the reasons why it raises concerns about “erosion of privacy” and freedom (The Wall Street Journal,  2020 ). The literature doubts that the techno‐driven approach adopted in China could be replicated anywhere else in the world (Kupferschmidt & Cohen,  2020 ).

Western democracies adopted a human‐driven approach (Kummitha,  2020 ) (Table  1 ). This approach adopted when the government has restrictions on the collection and use of citizens' data (personal data protection and privacy laws) (Kupferschmidt & Cohen,  2020 ) and therefore has to take the context into account and be very selective when using technologies because of the many sensitive limitations (Kummitha,  2020 ).

Thus, the approach chosen by municipalities depends on a number of factors: the extent to which the regulations allow tracking citizens, collecting personal data, and addressing an individual if specifically required for public safety (Table  2 ).

Techno‐and human‐driven approaches during a pandemic: additional criteria for qualification

As shown in Table  2 , the techno‐driven approach implies data collection and processing at an individual level, while the human‐driven approach deals with aggregated data. The literature points out that the techno‐driven approach is more effective during a pandemic than the human‐driven approach (Kummitha,  2020 ; WHO,  2019 ), because, for example, relying on anonymous data may not be as effective as collecting data from individuals (Stamati et al.,  2015 ). Relying on quantitative analysis, Yang and Chong (Yang & Chong,  2021 ) concluded that the investment in smart cities decreases the number of COVID‐19 cases. That is one of the reasons why “technology” is considered a key factor in predicting and controlling a pandemic such as COVID‐19 (Yang & Chong,  2021 ). However, along with the benefits, the use of AI and Big Data (for the techno‐driven approach) could raise concerns, because increased transparency (making the collected data publicly available) may violate privacy (Janssen & van den Hoven,  2015 ). The literature also specifies other reasons why technology alone could not be an effective solution in the public sector (Kuziemski & Misuraca,  2020 ). While the opportunities are well‐described, the literature points out that “the risks and downsides are given less attention” and “the effects are hard to predict and accountability requires both the curation of data and algorithm” (Janssen & Kuk,  2016 , p. 376). That is why “evidence‐based policies are not a panacea for many reasons” (Nam,  2020 , p. 1). The literature does not conclude which approach (techno‐ or human‐driven) is preferable for smart city authorities during a pandemic and suggests tailoring it to the local needs and resources available (Inn,  2020 ). Considering that each approach has its pros and cons, Kitchin ( 2020 ) suggests that governments should try to respect both civil liberties (not to collect, process, and share personal data—the human‐driven approach) and public health (collect, process, and share personal data—the techno‐driven approach). Therefore, further research of possible trade‐offs is required to make the use of smart city technologies during a pandemic more liberty‐friendly.

2.2. Types of measures municipalities may implement during a pandemic

Based on WHO‐recommended strategies for the prevention and control of communicable diseases (WHO,  2001 ), which is aligned with the epidemic theory (Patten & Arboleda‐Flórez,  2004 ), there are four types of measures that municipalities can implement during a pandemic: (1) active surveillance and issuing warnings; (2) identification of the infected; (3) isolation; and (4) lockdown and quarantine.

Active surveillance and warnings are measures aimed at preventing citizens from being infected. Identification is the measure aimed at identifying possibly infected citizens for further tests and decisions on isolation and quarantine. Once an infected person is identified, they need to be isolated from society. Isolation is a process of instructing a person on the next steps toward quarantine. Lockdown and quarantine are the measures aimed at preventing infected persons from infecting others.

These four measures could be supported by smart city technologies to a different extent. Table  3 demonstrates that the “Active surveillance and issuing warnings” type of measures relies on the largest number of smart city devices: “As advised by WHO and learned from the Chinese context, early surveillance is the most effective strategy available for the prevention of transmission” (Kummitha,  2020 , p. 8).

Available smart city technologies to support the four types of measures during a pandemic

Therefore, the approach municipalities choose is based on:

  • Whether a municipality activates all available smart city components to fight the pandemic, or uses them selectively because of some limitations;
  • Whether a municipality uses smart city components to support the four types of measures or only some of them.

I will elaborate upon the above in Section  4 to explore the approach adopted by the Moscow authorities.

3. RESEARCH APPROACH

This section describes the data selected for the study, the methods, and the analytical approach adopted. This paper is a part of a more extensive research project 1 that focuses on the analysis of changes in public administration driven by digital technologies.

3.1. Case selection

As mentioned, while the techno‐driven approach was predominantly used in China (Kupferschmidt & Cohen,  2020 ), Western countries adopted a human‐driven approach (Kummitha,  2020 ). Russia is geographically located between China and Western countries and has an advanced smart city infrastructure and strict privacy regulations at the same time. Russia was one of the most severely affected countries in the world (as of May 8, 2020, Russia had the third‐largest number of new coronavirus cases identified in the world (Worldometer,  2020 )). Considering the above, the author decided to study Russia's experience in using smart city technologies in fighting the COVID‐19 pandemic. The study analyzes Moscow's experience for three main reasons.

Firstly, being the capital city, Moscow has the most advanced smart city technologies in Russia, and the article aims to explore whether the authorities were able to use the technologies in line with the privacy protection laws in place. In terms of smart city devices, nowadays, Moscow authorities collect data from surveillance cameras (installed on public buses, the subway, and at traffic lights, 193,000 cameras in total) (Forbes,  2020a ; Moscow Department of Information Technology,  2020 ), taxi and car‐sharing services, transport (transport card transactions), GLONASS sensors, and Caesar‐Satellite anti‐theft systems (BBC,  2020b ). The AI system allows for finding a person's location in the city based on a photo. The main source of photos has been doctors, who are required to take pictures of infected (quarantined) citizens when visiting them (BBC,  2020b ). The cameras are also used to identify the elderly who left their home. However, the system has reportedly had some problems identifying individuals wearing face masks (BBC,  2020b ). Since 2015, Moscow authorities have had access to geolocation data from mobile providers and have been collecting voice samples of citizens calling the city hotline (BBC,  2020b ). Free Wi‐Fi points, the mos. ru, and other city services were used as data sources; and since 2017, even if a person turned on the incognito mode in a browser, the system would recognize the person and collect data (BBC,  2020b ). It was declared that Moscow authorities have no direct access to the bank transaction history of the residents; but the authorities have access to the data on citizen's property and related payments (BBC,  2020b ). In some countries, such as South Korea, the government monitored both the phones and credit cards of the infected and quarantined citizens after informing them about these measures (Lee & Lee,  2020 ). Moscow is equipped with similar types of smart city devices as China and South Korea, except for robots and temperature screening systems (sensors) for public places.

Secondly, due to the high population concentration, Moscow had the largest number of the infected in Russia and there was an urgency to use any available means to combat the spread of the disease.

Finally, at first glance, it was hard to determine whether the approach applied by the Moscow authorities was techno‐driven or human‐driven. During the outbreak, the Russian government did not introduce equal and synchronized measures for all Russian cities. However, the Moscow authorities experimented with measures and technologies to keep the pandemic under control. Upon the introduction of certain measures in Moscow, other cities and regions adopted some of the measures as well (Vedomosti,  2020b ).

3.2. Identification of the data

The following data sources were used to answer the research question: scholarly articles, news articles, government reports and decrees, mobile applications of the Moscow and federal authorities, and WHO reports.

WHO reports were found using Google, by filtering the search results of trusted sources. Research articles about the role of technologies in tackling COVID‐19 transmission were found using a search engine in Scopus on May 8, 2020, and updated on May 12, 2021, with search phrases such as “coronavirus OR COVID‐19 AND “smart technology” OR “smart city”” (1688 documents in Scopus, 49,576 results in Science Direct), ““Smart City” AND Moscow AND COVID‐19 OR pandemic” (23 documents in Scopus, 83,269 results in Science Direct). The results were narrowed down by using filters, searching within search results, using recommended and cited articles to find information on the article's scope. To find newspaper articles on the devices that were used in smart cities around the world, I looked through news items that covered the first 5 months of 2020. The search was conducted in Google and Yandex News, and the results were limited to popular and trusted media sources. The search for the use of specific devices of the smart city system was performed using Google, with search phrases such as “Moscow coronavirus temperature sensors public places”. Government reports (both nationwide and Moscow‐specific), and decrees on the measures during the pandemic in Russia were found on the relevant government websites or trusted law databases using Google. Google and the App Store were used to explore websites, infection maps, and applications. In total 59 sources (articles, newspapers, websites) were selected and cited in this paper.

3.3. Analysis

To assess whether a techno‐ or human‐driven approach was applied by Moscow, I considered Kummitha's ( 2020 ) definition of the key differences between the approaches (Table  1 ). I defined three key criteria for determining the approach to using smart city technologies during a pandemic based on the literature (Table  2 ). Also based on the literature, I distributed the types of smart city components of the four types of municipal measures during a pandemic that they could support (Table  3 ). Using the qualification matrices to explore the approach described in Tables  2 and ​ and3, 3 , I would conclude that the approach used by Moscow authorities was technology‐driven, if:

  • It was characterized by the immediate and forceful activation of all 2 available smart city devices for all 3 types of measures.
  • The authorities collected the personal data of citizens (data from surveillance cameras, geolocation, temperature screening systems, QR‐codes, etc.).
  • The authorities openly shared data processing results (the data on the travel history/paths of the infected citizens), based on that the authorities contacted those who got infected or possibly got infected to apply the measures.

I would conclude that the approach applied by Moscow authorities was human‐driven, if:

  • 4 It was characterized by selective and time distributed activation of smart city devices.
  • 5 The authorities did not collect the personal data of citizens, and would rather collect anonymous data.
  • 6 The authorities were not openly sharing data after processing; the authorities predominantly were focused on sharing anonymous aggregated data on the infected citizens and warnings to society.

In order to determine the approach adopted by Moscow authorities, I explored the smart city components that were available in Moscow and the extent to which they had been used to fight the pandemic (Tables  4 and ​ and5). 5 ). Based on the results, I made a conclusion on the type of the approach that was adopted by Moscow authorities and suggested the qualification matrix to define the approach applied by the authorities during the pandemic (Table  6 ).

Smart city technologies of Moscow in action during the pandemic

The approach of the Moscow authorities to use smart city technologies during the outbreak of COVID‐19

Qualification matrix for the approach applied by the authorities during the pandemic

The first infected person in Russia was identified in Moscow (Ministry of DDCMM of the Russian Federation,  2020 ) and Moscow was the city with the largest number of infected citizens in Russia. In this section, I explore the extent to which Moscow used its smart technologies to fight COVID‐19. I describe the key features of the approach used by the Russian government and focus on the comparison between the available and utilized components of Moscow's smart city system.

4.1. COVID‐19 outbreak: Key features of the government's approach

There are two main features of the approach adopted by the Russian government during the COVID‐19 outbreak. First, a State of Emergency was not declared, lockdown or quarantine measures were not introduced in Russia; secondly, each region could introduce its own measures (Vedomosti,  2020b ). When the federal government launched a mobile application designed for self‐identification and for using QR passes, it was not mandatory for use by citizens or regional governments (Ministry of DDCMM of the Russian Federation,  2020 ). As a result, the application was not widely and systematically used. The literature points out that the transfer of measures from the national to municipal level was one of the success factors in fighting the pandemic in other countries (Huynh et al.,  2020 ).

When the situation began to deteriorate, Moscow authorities introduced a self‐isolation regime for all citizens. Moscow authorities developed several scenarios for COVID‐19 transmission in Russia and introduced measures for each possible scenario; all other regions considered the Moscow's experience the best practice (Vedomosti,  2020a ). Moscow Mayor Sobyanin signed a decree on regulation and restrictions, but despite the pandemic, a State of Emergency was not introduced in Moscow, along with the lockdown and quarantine measures. At the same time, quarantine was introduced for elderly people in Moscow — adults 65 or older being most vulnerable (Forbes,  2020b ). The common protocol of the identification of infected people in Moscow was self‐identification. Moscow authorities distributed instructions (the websites of Moscow's Mayor and Moscow's Government,  2020 ) stating that if a citizen has SARS or seasonal allergy symptoms, they should call a doctor for further instructions. Moscow authorities were quite transparent in sharing the information daily through a special website and in the media (The official portal of the Moscow's Mayor and Moscow's Government,  2020 ).

4.2. Smart city components used during the pandemic in Moscow

The Smart City concept is quite popular in Russia. Based on the IQ Index of Russian cities 4 (covering 191 cities), Moscow has the highest urban digitalization index, followed by Kazan and Saint Petersburg (Russian newspaper [Rossiyskaya Gazeta],  2020 ). The Smart City concept of Moscow is similar to other projects all around the world and is aimed at “the development of urban management by increasing the efficiency and transparency of urban management; improving the life quality of the Moscow population by the large‐scale use of information and communication technologies in the social sphere, in the sphere of ensuring the integrated security of the city of Moscow and in other spheres of city administration in Moscow, as well as in the citizens' everyday life” (Ruzina,  2020 ). Moscow authorities have been implementing smart city technologies since 2010 based on the Singapore model (International Telecommunication Union,  2018 ). Moscow was ranked 72nd in the Smart City Index 2019 (The IMD World Competitiveness Center,  2019 ), which ranks 102 cities worldwide and measures how citizens perceive the impact of policies on their daily lives. Singapore holds the 1st place, Zurich and Oslo are in 2nd and 3rd, respectively.

When the pandemic began and the self‐isolation regime was introduced, Moscow authorities announced that they would use the current smart city system to monitor citizens (RBC,  2021 ). The wide use of smart city technologies to fight the pandemic was possible due to changes in federal legislation that were introduced in April 2020 (Markotkin,  2021 ). These changes allowed the Moscow authorities to conduct experiments involving the use of smart city technologies to improve the life of the citizens and the efficiency of governance (Markotkin,  2021 ), however, these new amendments guaranteed the protection of privacy during the experiments.

However, there was no forceful and immediate activation of available smart city technologies for active surveillance, identification, and isolation of infected persons—the approach was time distributed and selective (not all available smart city technologies were used, the measures differ from the ones in other regions of Russia) (Table  4 ).

For instance, high alert mode was put into place in Moscow on March 16 (Moscow Government,  2020 ). A “social monitoring” application to track infected citizens was launched on April 2, 2020 ( Mjerija Moskvy Gotova Primenjat’ QR‐Kody Dlja Kontrolja Rezhima Izoljacii [The Moscow City Government Is Ready to Apply QR Codes to Control the Mode of Isolation],   2020 ), and from April 13, 2020, the QR‐pass system was introduced for those who needed to leave their residence ( Sobjanin Ob'javil o Vvedenii v Moskve Specpropuskov. Chto Jeto Znachit [Sobyanin Announced the Introduction of Special Passes in Moscow. What Does It Mean],   2020 ).

Not all available smart city technologies were activated in Moscow to keep the virus under control. The technologies were mostly focused on the isolation and quarantine of infected citizens and less focused on active surveillance to issue warnings and tracking to identify potentially infected persons to isolate them for further lockdown and quarantine. Evidence of the wide use of the technologies (cameras, for instance) for active surveillance and issuing warnings for COVID‐19‐related purposes in Moscow has not been found. However, these technologies were used in urgent situations: surveillance cameras were used to track potentially infected citizens when the first infected person was identified (Vedomosti,  2020a ). Based on surveillance camera records and geolocation data from mobile phones, all persons that the infected person contacted (including family members) were identified and quarantined. Text messages were used to inform potentially infected citizens of their status and the need to self‐isolate (RIA Novosti,  2020b ). This demonstrates that the data were collected and processed on an individual level and were not anonymized. However, smart city technologies were used in cases of emergency. Moscow authorities were sharing aggregated (anonymized) data on Internet websites only and never published the data on the travel history of the infected citizens. Publicly available maps for Russia (Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation,  2020 ) and Moscow (Mash,  2020 ) show the addresses from where infected persons were taken to a hospital.

The approach introduced by Moscow authorities was issue‐based—smart city technologies were used only based on evidence (when an infected person was identified). The most active measure of the authorities to prevent the disease among citizens was to issue a recommendation to self‐isolate. Self‐identification mode was required for infected citizens (who had symptoms and were suspected of being infected). While WHO recommendations and the Chinese experience show that “governments need to impose lockdowns as early as possible” (Kummitha,  2020 , p. 8), lockdowns and quarantines were not imposed in Moscow.

The business community tried to contribute by offering technologies to the authorities. For instance, AT Consulting VOSTOK developed a solution to identify infected citizens (including the potentially infected) (ComNews,  2020 ). Drone producers suggested using drones for monitoring public places (to avoid crowds) and infrastructure during an emergency shutdown of enterprises for alerting the citizens about antiviral activities, for the expedited delivery of medical tests, samples, vaccines, and drugs, and for applying antiseptics and disinfectants to potentially infected areas (RBC,  2020 ). However, none of those suggestions were accepted by Moscow authorities.

As mentioned in Section  4.1 , no uniform anti‐COVID‐19 measures were implemented in all Russian regions (Vedomosti,  2020b ). Moscow was leading the way in introducing the regulation to get COVID‐19 under control, and the regions were adopting some of them. For instance, in Tatarstan, it was required that citizens receive a text message with a permit to leave their homes. The permit was valid for only 1 hour, and it could be obtained only twice a day. QR‐code identification was launched in the Nizhny Novgorod region (The website of the Moscow Mayor and Moscow Government, 2020). In many other regions of Russia, AI systems were used to quickly collect data on the number of free hospital beds, ambulance crews online, etc (RIA Novosti,  2020a ). These data were used to make forecasts and arrange medical assistance effectively. Using AI allows the reduction in the number of people involved in the collection and analysis of information (from 100 to 200 specialists at a call‐center to 10–15).

In order to assess people's perception of smart technologies applied by the Moscow authorities during the pandemic, a number of surveys were conducted. One survey reported, “The population does not believe in an easy solution, as in H.G. Wells' The War of the Worlds; on the contrary, the more the screws are tightened, the quieter the crisis is perceived” (translated by the author) ( How Do Russians Respond to the Epidemic? Polling Stories [Kak Rossijane Reagirujut Na Jepidemiju? Istorii Oprosov], 2020 ). Citizens experienced issues with some of the technologies, for instance, with the Social Monitoring application aimed at tracking home‐treated infected citizens (issues with downloading the app, registration, issues with uploading a photo, etc.) even when mobile devices were provided to the infected by the mayor's office ( “Social Monitoring”: How Moscow Mocks the Quarantined Sick [“Social'nyj Monitoring”: Kak Moskva Izdevaetsja Nad Zapertymi v Karantin Bol'nymi], 2020 )). As a consequence, people were fined for violating the regulations and were not happy about it (gave the application low scores and negative reviews) ( Mobile Application “Social Monitoring” Reviews, 2021 ).

5. DISCUSSION

5.1. the approach of the moscow authorities: neither techno‐driven nor human‐driven.

The approach of the Moscow authorities could be qualified as human‐driven because it was selective and time distributed, and the authorities shared aggregated (anonymized) data on the infected citizens (Table  5 ).

In other regions of Russia, AI systems were used to quickly collect data to make forecasts and arrange medical assistance effectively (RIA Novosti,  2020a ). However, this practice was not common for all Russian regions. The absence of harmonized country‐wide measures to fight the pandemic (Vedomosti,  2020b ) also proves that the approach of the authorities was rather selective.

However, the approach introduced by Moscow authorities also has the attributes of the technology‐driven approach (Table  5 ), because it allows for collecting the personal data along with the ability to contact infected or potentially infected individuals when required (based on the data processing results). For instance, the Moscow authorities were collecting the personal data from surveillance cameras, mobile phones, and so on, and were using them when they needed to find, track, or inform (by a text message) the infected or potentially infected persons.

Thus, I concluded that Moscow authorities adopted a hybrid model that combines features of the techno‐driven and human‐driven models (Table  5 ). Smart city technologies in Moscow were used selectively and were mostly focused on the isolation and quarantine of the infected and less focused upon active surveillance to issue warnings, identify potentially infected persons and to isolate them for further lockdown and quarantine. These technologies allowed the authorities to collect the personal data and use them when there was a need to find, track, or inform the infected or potentially infected person, but it was shared only in an anonymized form. A State of Emergency was not declared, lockdown and quarantine were not introduced in Russia, and there were no uniform country‐wide measures in place (each of the regions was able to introduce their own measures to fight the pandemic).

5.2. Theoretical and practical implications

“Human history has always been about keeping up with technological advances to make life more comfortable (fire), easier (the wheel), more productive (the printing press, steam power), and more mobile (the car)”. (Done,  2012 , p. 53). Humanity has achieved fantastic results in the development of technology, but during the pandemic, it faced the paradox of the inability to use it at full capacity. This is because along with the development of the technologies, humanity was developing the concept of key civil rights and liberties, which resulted in the implementation of legislation such as the European Convention on Human Rights (Glas,  2013 ) or General Data Protection Regulation (Otto,  2018 ). “But in emergencies like pandemics, privacy must be weighed against other considerations, like saving lives”, said Mila Romanoff, the data and governance lead for United Nations Global Pulse (The New York Times,  2020a ). “I am more and more convinced the greatest battle of our time is against the “religion of privacy”. It literally could get us all killed”, said the former Portuguese Europe Minister Bruno Macaes (BBC,  2020a ).

Authorities around the world were not ready for the COVID‐19 outbreak and when it happened, they used the means that were available in each specific country or municipality. As demonstrated in Section  2.1 , the available literature defines the techno‐driven and human‐driven approaches used by the authorities during the pandemic. The techno‐driven approach is considered more effective in fighting the pandemic (Kummitha,  2020 ; WHO,  2019 ), but it cannot be replicated in countries with strict privacy regulations (Kupferschmidt & Cohen,  2020 ). The active use of technologies during the pandemic was criticized for overreach and the “erosion of privacy” (The Wall Street Journal,  2020 ) because “the increased surveillance and health data disclosures have also drastically eroded people's ability to keep their health status private” (The New York Times,  2020a ). The governments were also expected to find ways to use technologies while complying with data protection laws at the same time, and to reconsider the balance between personal privacy and public safety (The New York Times,  2020a ). The technologies are developing very rapidly and the literature suggests that a trade‐off model is needed to harmonize civil liberties and public health (Kitchin,  2020 ).

In this regard, the article demonstrates the existence of a hybrid model that could represent a new generation of approaches aimed at finding a meaningful balance between privacy and public safety, using the benefits of technology. The literature shows that technology alone could not be an effective solution in the public sector (Kuziemski & Misuraca,  2020 ) and a hybrid model of the use of smart city technologies significantly resonates with this statement. The model relies on the strength of the technology and acknowledges its role in fighting the pandemic, allowing the authorities for temporary tracking of the infected persons for the sake of public safety. However, using such a model might require amending the legislation in time to make it work, which might be quite difficult to do in some countries. This is one of the limitations of the hybrid model. The existence of emergency protocols for the use of smart city technologies could be a solution for such countries. The hybrid model is selective in using technologies (not all available technologies are used at all stages of fighting the pandemic, and the protocols used could differ from one region to the next) and it is cautious with data collection (for many reasons). For instance, Russia “lacks the vast troves of user data possessed by China” (Goode,  2020 , p. 1).

The existence of hybrid models is important for several reasons. First, from a theoretical point of view, the hybrid model adopted in Moscow demonstrates the existence of alternative models other than the two main model types identified in the literature (Table  5 ). Further research could focus on developing a classification of hybrid models and analyzing the factors that shape them in different countries. Based on the demand for the trade‐off between civil rights and public safety, hybrid models need to be explored further. At the same time, the findings of the article contributes to the studies of the public administration model in Russia.

Secondly, from a practical point of view, the hybrid model will allow governments to have a third option and use smart city technologies effectively while meeting the requirements of local regulations on privacy. That means that authorities do not need to choose one of the two main approaches but could consider a hybrid model (Table  5 ). There are clear practical intentions from the countries that were not satisfied with the human‐driven models to find such a hybrid approach. “These are strange times. Germany, perhaps the most privacy‐conscious nation on Earth, is considering a mobile phone app that would trace the contacts of anyone infected with COVID‐19” (BBC,  2020a ). During the emergency, former New York Governor Cuomo “got the unlimited authority to rule by executive order during state crises like pandemics and hurricanes” (The New York Times,  2020a ). Another example of such an approach comes from Israel where the government was allowed to use mobile provider data of infected people within 30 days: “We have to maintain the balance between the rights of the individual and needs of general society, and we are doing that”, said former Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu at the time (The New York Times,  2020b ). Nevertheless, when looking for a balance the authorities would need to decide on how much data is enough, and further research and practical experiments should help in answering this question.

Thirdly, the existence of a hybrid model is important from a political point of view, because using a techno‐driven approach that violates freedoms could negatively affect the political reputation of governors even if it is successful from a healthcare point of view. The use of a flexible and meaningful approach could bring many benefits for the politicians who could, for instance, arrange public participation in choosing the extent of using the technologies in emergency situations.

The results described in Table  5 could be presented as a Qualification matrix for the approach applied by the authorities during a pandemic (Table  6 ).

The Qualification matrix could be useful for the theoretical analysis of models applied in other countries (regions) and classifying them. The matrix is also useful for a self‐audit and policy development within a region and a country. “The pandemic may, finally, humanize the use of high‐tech in cities. The smart city models of a generation ago were all about regulation and control—the state online. What's emerging in this pandemic are good programs and protocols which create community”, stated Richard Sennett, Professor of Urban Studies at MIT (Digital Leaders,  2020 ). Therefore, the exploration of new hybrid models of a government approach to pandemics, including the limitations and new trade‐offs, could be popular for some time, because many questions remain to be answered both in theory and in practice.

6. CONCLUSION

Many countries implemented smart city technologies, but during the COVID‐19 outbreak in 2020, some countries were able to use its full capacity (the techno‐driven approach), while others could do this only selectively (the human‐driven approach) because of strict privacy protection legislation. The literature suggests that along with these two approaches, an alternative model would add value. The Russian Federation has advanced smart city infrastructure and strict legislation on privacy protection simultaneously. This paper explored the approach of the Moscow authorities to using smart city technologies during the COVID‐19 outbreak in 2020 and concluded that the authorities used a hybrid approach which demonstrates the features of both human‐driven and techno‐driven approaches. The author developed a Qualification matrix to define the approach used by authorities during the pandemic.

This research was based on publicly available sources of information and did not rely on any internal data of the authorities that could potentially influence the findings. For instance, only publicly available data were used when assessing whether smart city devices were utilized for the specific government measure. That may mean that other devices can also be used, but no information about such devices was available via the open sources. This is the main limitation of this research. As the next step, the results of the research could be validated through interviews with the managers of the smart city system of Moscow.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

This article is a part of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at HSE University. The research was undertaken independently by the author.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their encouragement and guidance throughout the review process. The paper has significantly benefited from their comments. I also thank Rama Krishna Reddy Kummitha, Michael Revyakin, Keld Pedersen, Joel Cumberland and David Connolly for their discussions on the drafts of this paper.

Revyakin, S. A. (2022). Personal privacy VS. public safety: A hybrid model of the use of smart city solutions in fighting the COVID‐19 pandemic in Moscow . Public Administration and Development , 42 ( 5 ), 281–292. 10.1002/pad.1997 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

1 Under the Basic Research Program at the HSE University.

2 Where applicable.

3 Where applicable.

4 Index of digitalization of the urban economy.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

  • 360TV. (2020). Franciya odobrila prilozhenie dlya slezhki iz‐za SOVID‐19. Kak kontroliruyut lyudej v drugih stranah? [France approved COVID‐19 surveillance application. How to control people in other countries?]. Retrieved from https://360tv.ru/news/tekst/slezhka-iz-za-sovid-19/
  • BBC . (2020a). Coronavirus: Privacy in a pandemic . Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52135916
  • BBC . (2020b). Smart city or big brother? How the city Hall learned to know everything about Muscovites ["Umnyj gorod" ili “Starshij brat”? Kak meriya nauchilas’ znat’ o moskvichah vsyo] . Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-52219260
  • Cabestan, J. P. (2020). The state and digital society in China: Big brother Xi is watching you . Issues & Studies , 56 ( 1 ), 2040003. 10.1142/S1013251120400032 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • CNN. (2020). Singapore deploys robot “dog” to encourage social distancing. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/08/tech/singapore-coronavirus-social-distancing-robot-intl-hnk/index.html
  • ComNews . (2020). Resident of Novosibirsk Academpark AT Consulting Vostok has developed an IT system to combat coronavirus [Rezident novosibirskogo Akademparka AT Consulting Vostok razrabotal IT‐sistemu dlya bor’by s koronavirusom] . Retrieved from https://www.comnews.ru/content/205355/2020-04-02/2020-w14/rezident-novosibirskogo-akademparka-consulting-vostok-razrabotal-it-sistemu-dlya-borby-koronavirusom
  • Coronavirus‐monitor. (2020). Coronavirus online map. Retrieved from https://coronavirus-monitor.com/
  • Done, A. (2012). Facing up to a changing world. In Global trends (Issue June) (pp. 247–265). 10.1057/9780230358973_14 [ CrossRef ]
  • Editorial. (2020). Face ID firms battle Covid‐19 as users shun fingerprinting. Biometric Technology Today , 2020 (4), 1–2. 10.1016/S0969-4765(20)30042-4 [ CrossRef ]
  • Ekman, A. (2019). China’s smart cities: The new geopolitical battleground (Issue December) . Études de l’Ifri. Retrieved from https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ekman_smart_cites_battleground_2019.pdf [ Google Scholar ]
  • Forbes . (2020a). How Moscow received for $ 3.2 million the world’s best face recognition system [Kak Moskva poluchila za $3,2 mln luchshuyu v mire sistemu raspoznavaniya lic] . Retrieved from https://www.forbes.ru/tehnologii/392303-kak-moskva-poluchila-za-32-mln-luchshuyu-v-mire-sistemu-raspoznavaniya-lic
  • Forbes . (2020b). Russia has begun to restrict exit from cities, putin is in Kommunarka, and the auto industry is stopping: COVID‐19 pandemic news [V Rossii nachali ogranichivat’ vyezd iz gorodov, putin v Kommunarke, a avtopromyshlennost’ ostanavlivaetsya: novosti pandemii . Retrieved from https://www.forbes.ru/tehnologii/395915-v-rossii-nachali-ogranichivat-vyezd-iz-gorodov-putin-v-kommunarke
  • Glas, L. R. (2013). European convention on human rights . Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights , 31 ( 2 ), 210–216. 10.1192/pb.27.12.463-a [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Goode, P. (2020). Russia and digital surveillance in the wake of COVID‐19 . PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo. Retrieved from https://www.ponarseurasia.org/russia‐and‐digital‐surveillance‐in‐the‐wake‐of‐covid‐19/ [ Google Scholar ]
  • How do Russians respond to the epidemic? Polling stories [Kak rossijane reagirujut na jepidemiju? Istorii oprosov] . (2020). Retrieved from https://www.kramola.info/vesti/protivostojanie/kak‐rossiyane‐reagiruyut‐na‐epidemiyu‐istorii‐oprosov
  • Huynh, D. , Tosun, M. S. , & Yilmaz, S. (2020). All‐of‐government response to the COVID‐19 pandemic: The case of Vietnam . Public Administration and Development , 40 ( 4 ), 236–239. 10.1002/pad.1893 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Inn, T. L. (2020). Smart city technologies take on COVID‐19 . Penang Institute Issues, 27. 10.7551/mitpress/11426.003.0005 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • International Telecommunication Union . (2018). Implementing ITU‐T internati onal standards to shape smart sustainable cities: The case of Moscow . Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Documents/tsb/2018-U4SSC-Case-of-Moscow/files/downloads/The-Case-of-Moscow-E_18-00503.pdf
  • Janssen, M. , & Kuk, G. (2016). The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance . Government Information Quarterly , 33 ( 3 ), 371–377. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Janssen, M. , & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly , 32 ( 4 ), 363–368. 10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kim, W. , & Lee, J.‐D. (2009). Measuring the role of technology‐push and demand‐pull in the dynamic development of the semiconductor industry: The case of the global DRAM market . Journal of Applied Economics , 12 ( 1 ), 83‐108. 10.1016/S1514-0326(09)60007-6 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kitchin, R. (2020). Civil liberties or public health, or civil liberties and public health? Using surveillance technologies to tackle the spread of COVID‐19 . Space and Polity , 24 ( 3 ), 362–381. 10.1080/13562576.2020.1770587 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kummitha, R. K. R. (2020). Smart technologies for fighting pandemics: The techno‐ and human‐driven approaches in controlling the virus transmission . Government Information Quarterly. 101481. 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101481 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kupferschmidt, K. , & Cohen, J. (2020). Can China’s COVID‐19 strategy work elsewhere? In Science (Vol. 367 ( 6482 ), pp. 1061–1062). 10.1126/science.367.6482.1062 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kuziemski, M. , & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision‐making in democratic settings . Telecommunications Policy, 101976. 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Leaders, D. (2020). Smart cities during COVID‐19 . Retrieved from https://digileaders.com/smart-cities-during-covid-19/
  • Lee, D. , & Lee, J. (2020). Testing on the move: South Korea’s rapid response to the COVID‐19 pandemic . Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives , 5 , 100111. 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100111 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu, H. , & Li, Y. (2020). Smart cities for emergency management . Nature , 578 ( 7796 ), 515. 10.1038/d41586-020-00523-5 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mansfield‐Devine, S. (2020). Editorial. Computer Fraud & Security , 2020 (4), 2. 10.1016/S1361-3723(20)30034-8 [ CrossRef ]
  • Markotkin, N. (2021). Does coronavirus herald the age of totalitarian surveillance in Russia and Eurasia? Retrieved from https://carnegie.ru/commentary/84044
  • Mash . (2020). Where in Moscow they took the coronavirus diagnosed . Retrieved from https://coronavirus.mash.ru/
  • Ministry of DDCMM of the Russian Federation . (2020). The federal application “Stopkoronavirus Government Services” will not be applied in Moscow [Federal’noe prilozhenie «Gosuslugi Stopkoronavirus» ne budet primenyat’sya v Moskve] . Retrieved from https://digital.gov.ru/ru/events/39746/
  • Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation . (2020). Map of the distribution of coronavirus in our country: [Karta rasprostraneniya koronavirusa u nas v strane:] . Retrieved from https://covid19.rosminzdrav.ru/
  • Mjerija Moskvy gotova primenjat’ QR‐kody dlja kontrolja rezhima izoljacii [The Moscow City Government is ready to apply QR codes to control the mode of isolation] . (2020). Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4309878
  • Mobile application “Social Monitoring” reviews . (2021). Retrieved from https://www.otzyvru.com/mobilnoe-prilojenie-sotsialniy-monitoring
  • Moscow Department of Information Technology . (2020). Information technology [informacionnye tekhnologii] . Retrieved from https://video.dit.mos.ru/
  • Moscow Government . (2020). Ukaz mjera Moskvy ot 16 marta 2020 goda № 21‐UM “O vnesenii izmenenija v ukaz Mjera Moskvy ot 5 marta 2020 g. № 12‐UM” [decree of the mayor of Moscow No. 21‐UM, March 16, 2020 “on the amendments to decree of the mayor of Moscow No. 12‐UM, March 5, 2020”.] . Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2020/03/16/moscow-ukaz21-reg-dok.html
  • Nam, T. (2020). Do the right thing right! Understanding the hopes and hypes of data‐based policy . Government Information Quarterly , 37 ( 3 ), 101491. 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101491 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Novosti, R. I. A. (2020a). The expert told how the project of “smart city” helped in the fight against COVID‐19 [Ekspert rasskazal, kak proekt “umnogo goroda” pomog v bor’be s COVID‐19] . Retrieved from https://ria.ru/20200514/1571411223.html
  • Novosti, R. I. A. (2020b). Pravitel’stvo Moskvy razoslalo SMS letevshim s bol’nymi koronavirusom [Moscow government sent out a text message to those who flew with coronavirus patients] . Retrieved from https://ria.ru/20200311/1568434059.html
  • Otto, M. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation—GDPR) (pp. 958–981). International and European Labour Law, 2014. 10.5771/9783845266190-974 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Patten, S. B. , & Arboleda‐Flórez, J. A. (2004). Epidemic theory and group violence . Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology , 39 ( 11 ), 853–856. 10.1007/s00127-004-0867-9 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Quijano‐Sánchez, L. , Cantador, I. , Cortés‐Cediel, M. E. , & Gil, O. (2020). Recommender systems for smart cities . Information Systems , 92 , 101545. 10.1016/j.is.2020.101545 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • RBC . (2020). Sobyanin has been suggested using drones to fight coronavirus [Sobyaninu predlozhili ispol’zovat’ bespilotniki dlya bor’by s koronavirusom] . Retrieved from https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/11/04/2020/5e9048ea9a7947acdee3399e
  • RBC . (2021). Innovacii protiv pandemii: Kak Moskva boretsya s COVID‐19 [innovations against the pandemic: How Moscow fights COVID‐19 . Retrieved from https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/27/12/2021/61c6ecb09a7947b96e1a8c9a
  • Reuters. (2020). European mobile operators share data for coronavirus fight. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-europe-telecoms/european-mobile-operators-share-data-for-coronavirus-fight-idUSKBN2152C2
  • Russian newspaper [Rossiyskaya Gazeta] . (2020). The smartest cities in Russia announced [Nazvany samye umnye goroda Rossii] . Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2020/03/03/nazvany‐samye‐umnye‐goroda‐rossii.html
  • Ruzina, E. I. (2020). From information city to smart city: Russian experience of state entrepreneurship . Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies , 138 , 419–430. 10.1007/978-3-030-15577-3_41 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Selinger, C. (2020). Security trumps freedom? How governments are deploying mass surveillance tools in the name of coronavirus [Bezopasnost’ prevyshe svobody? Kak pravitel’stva vnedrjajut instrumenty massovoj slezhki pod predlogom koronavirusa . Retrieved from https://forklog.com/bezopasnost-prevyshe-svobody-kak-pravitelstva-vnedryayut-instrumenty-massovoj-slezhki-pod-predlogom-koronavirusa/
  • Sharifi, A. , Khavarian‐Garmsir, A. R. , & Kummitha, R. K. R. (2021). Contributions of smart city solutions and technologies to resilience against the COVID‐19 pandemic: A literature review . Sustainability , 13 ( 14 ), 8018. 10.3390/su13148018 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Shaw, R., Kim, Y., & Hua, J. (2020). Governance, technology and citizen behavior in pandemic: Lessons from COVID‐19 in East Asia. Progress in Disaster Science , 6 , 100090. 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sobjanin ob’javil o vvedenii v Moskve specpropuskov . (2020). Chto jeto znachit [Sobyanin announced the introduction of special passes in Moscow. What does it mean] . Retrieved from https://realty.rbc.ru/news/5e90b9c49a7947ed33760d3e
  • “Social’nyj monitoring”: kak Moskva izdevaetsja nad zapertymi v karantin bol’nymi [“Social Monitoring”: How Moscow Mocks the Quarantined Sick]. (2020). Retrieved from  https://www.yaplakal.com/forum1/topic2115063.html
  • Stamati, T. , Papadopoulos, T. , & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2015). Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context . Government Information Quarterly , 32 ( 1 ), 12–29. 10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • The IMD World Competitiveness Center . (2019). IMD smart city index 2019. IMD world competitiveness center’s smart city observatory . Retrieved from https://www.imd.org/globalassets/wcc/docs/smart_city/smart_city_index_digital.pdf
  • The New York Times . (2020a). As coronavirus surveillance Escalates, personal privacy plummets . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/technology/coronavirus-surveillance-tracking-privacy.html
  • The New York Times . (2020b). To track coronavirus, Israel Moves to tap secret trove of cellphone data . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/world/middleeast/israel-coronavirus-cellphone-tracking.html
  • The official portal of the Moscow’s Mayor and Moscow’s Government . (2020a). Coronavirus: Official information [Koronavirus: oficial’naya informaciya] . Retrieved from https://www.mos.ru/city/projects/covid-19/
  • The official portal of the Moscow Mayor and Moscow Government . (2020b). Moscow is technically ready for the operational launch of a smart home control system [Moskva tekhnicheski gotova k operativnomu zapusku umnoj sistemy kontrolya soblyudeniya domashnego rezhima] . Retrieved from https://www.mos.ru/news/item/72153073/
  • The Wall Street Journal . (2020). How coronavirus is eroding privacy . Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-paves-way-for-new-age-of-digital-surveillance-11586963028
  • Vedomosti . (2020a). How Moscow authorities plan to fight coronavirus [Kak vlasti Moskvy sobirayutsya borot’sya s koronavirusom] . Retrieved from https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/articles/2020/03/04/824469-borotsya-s-koronavirusom
  • Vedomosti . (2020b). Kak regiony samoizoliruyutsya ot koronavirusa [How regions self‐isolate from coronavirus] . Retrieved from https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/articles/2020/03/30/826650-regioni-koronavirusa
  • WHO . (2001). WHO recommended strategies for the prevention and control of communicable diseases . Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67088/WHO_CDS_CPE_SMT_2001.13.pdf
  • WHO . (2019). Report of the WHO‐China joint Mission on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) . Retrieved from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf
  • Worldometer . (2020). COVID‐19 coronavirus pandemic . Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
  • Yang, S. , & Chong, Z. (2021). Smart city projects against COVID‐19: Quantitative evidence from China . Sustainable Cities and Society , 70 ( February ), 102897. 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102897 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

IMAGES

  1. Travel insurance explained, from what to look for in a policy to

    sainsbury's travel insurance covid

  2. COVID-19: Sainsbury's reports £261m loss as pandemic and shake-up costs

    sainsbury's travel insurance covid

  3. Travel Insurance Guide in COVID-19 times

    sainsbury's travel insurance covid

  4. Sainsbury's: Cost of Covid has been high

    sainsbury's travel insurance covid

  5. Sainsbury's: Cost of Covid has been high

    sainsbury's travel insurance covid

  6. Sainsbury’s says Covid costs have been high, but sales improve

    sainsbury's travel insurance covid

COMMENTS

  1. Travel Insurance

    COVID cover as standard more info ; ... Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance is sold and administered by Hood Travel Limited, registered at Companies House 08318836. Hood Travel is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under registration number 597211. Hood Travel Limited's registered address is at 2nd Floor, Decora Court ...

  2. Single Trip Travel Insurance

    Covid-19 Cover. Covid-19 cover is included as standard on all of our policies. Don't forget to check the latest Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office ... Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance is sold and administered by Hood Travel Limited, registered at Companies House 08318836. Hood Travel is authorised and regulated by the Financial ...

  3. Sainsbury's Bank

    Your travel insurance policy can cover some pre-existing medical conditions Please declare any pre-existing medical conditions that you or anyone travelling on this policy have. By answering them, you confirm you have the authority and will provide complete and accurate medical information about everyone to be covered. ... Sainsbury's Bank plc ...

  4. Medical Cover

    Covid-19 Cover. Covid-19 cover is included as standard on all of our policies. Don't forget to check the latest Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office ... Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance is sold and administered by Hood Travel Limited, registered at Companies House 08318836. Hood Travel is authorised and regulated by the Financial ...

  5. Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance Review

    All Sainsbury's Bank travel insurance policies come with Covid-19 cover as standard, including cancellation cover if you're diagnosed with the virus within 14 days of your booked departure ...

  6. What Travel Insurance Covers COVID Quarantine?

    Fortunately, there are still insurance providers that'll provide coverage in the event you're affected by COVID-19, including: Trip cancellation. Trip delay. Medical care/hospitalization ...

  7. Compare Sainsbury's Bank travel insurance

    With Sainsbury's Bank you can choose between single-trip, annual multi-trip and extended-stay policies for trips lasting up to 548 days. Depending on where you intend to visit, you can opt for a policy that covers Europe, worldwide, or worldwide excluding the USA, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. Sainsbury's Bank travel insurance includes ...

  8. Omicron and Travel: So, Now Do I Need Trip Insurance?

    Fiji requires travel insurance to cover potential treatment for Covid-19, and makes it available from about $30. Some destinations, such as Anguilla , recommend rather than require travel insurance.

  9. How to Find Travel Insurance That Covers COVID

    Travel insurance comparison site Squaremouth (a NerdWallet partner) is one of the very few comparison sites that allows you to filter by policies that offer coronavirus coverage. To find a policy ...

  10. The 5 Best COVID-19 Travel Insurance Options

    Don't let COVID-19 concerns break the bank on your next vacation. A COVID-19 travel insurance plan can help cover costs of testing, quarantine and treatment.

  11. Does Travel Insurance Cover COVID?

    If you purchased travel insurance after the World Health Organization declared coronavirus a pandemic on March 11, 2020, then COVID-19 might be viewed by your insurance company as a foreseen event ...

  12. Travel Insurance With Cruise Cover

    Covid-19 Cover. Covid-19 cover is included as standard on all of our policies. Don't forget to check the latest Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office ... Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance is sold and administered by Hood Travel Limited, registered at Companies House 08318836. Hood Travel is authorised and regulated by the Financial ...

  13. Best Covid-19 Travel Insurance Plans Of 2024

    The average cost of Covid travel insurance is $733 per trip, based on Forbes Advisor's analysis of 23 pandemic travel insurance plans that include "cancel for any reason" travel insurance ...

  14. Understanding Travel Insurance Coverage For Covid Test ...

    If you test positive during your trip, a travel insurance plan that includes Covid coverage can cover costs for doctor and hospital bills, medicine and lab work, up to the plan's medical limits ...

  15. Travel Insurance During Coronavirus Pandemic: What To Know

    By Elaine Glusac. Nov. 26, 2020. When the pandemic struck, many travel insurance policies failed to cover Covid-19-related trip interruptions and cancellations, often because they excluded ...

  16. Why You Need COVID Travel Insurance for Summer Trips

    Other countries only require travel insurance if you're unvaccinated. For example, Singapore requires unvaccinated travelers to carry travel insurance with a minimum of S$30,000 coverage (about US$22,000). Vaccinated travelers are encouraged, but not required, to have insurance. TSA Extends Plane Mask Mandate Until April.

  17. Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance

    Founded in 1997, Sainsbury's Bank offer a range of policies which can be tailored to ensure you have the right cover in place. Underwritten by Great Lakes insurance SE GLISE), Sainsbury's Bank policies include access to a 24/7 medical assistance helpline, and can be tailored to cover many pre-existing medical conditions.

  18. Best COVID-19 Travel Insurance in March 2024

    This is the shortlist of the best travel insurance for COVID options: Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection. IMG. John Hancock Insurance Agency, Inc. Seven Corners. Travelex Insurance Services ...

  19. Travel Insurance For Medical Conditions

    Our team is ready to help with any questions about travel insurance for pre-existing conditions. Covid-19 Cover. Covid-19 cover is included as standard on all of our policies. Don't forget to check the latest Foreign, ... Sainsbury's Bank Travel Insurance is sold and administered by Hood Travel Limited, registered at Companies House ...

  20. With Covid Cases Rising, Moscow's Mayor Announces Lockdown

    A patient arriving at a Covid-focused hospital in Moscow last week. On Thursday, the city announced a return to some of the tightest restrictions in a year, including closing shops and restaurants.

  21. Smart City Data Sensing during COVID-19: Public Reaction to

    "Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many office workers have switched over to remote work and have found that they have more stress and less time for themselves. It turned out that when they took a couple of hours every day to get to and from work, there was more freedom. The number of excessive work hours are now three hours a day on average."

  22. Personal privacy VS. public safety: A hybrid model of the use of smart

    Research articles about the role of technologies in tackling COVID‐19 transmission were found using a search engine in Scopus on May 8, 2020, and updated on May 12, 2021, with search phrases such as "coronavirus OR COVID‐19 AND "smart technology" OR "smart city"" (1688 documents in Scopus, 49,576 results in Science Direct ...

  23. Russia imposes hospitality curfew to tackle spread of Covid

    CNN —. Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered a nationwide ban on hospitality events and catering from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. as the country struggles to control the Covid-19 pandemic . The ...